Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo, mail # dev - dependencies within 1.5


Copy link to this message
-
Re: dependencies within 1.5
Christopher 2013-05-20, 17:56
ACCUMULO-1436 for fixing "provided" dependencies.

--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're right. I'm not sure why our internal dependencies would be
> marked as provided... except maybe I made that mistake to try to deal
> with the mess of the 'copy-dependencies' stuff. That should be fixed.
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:24 AM, John Vines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jim, accumulo-start is a provided dependency for all of the other versions.
>> So when you list accumulo-server as a dependency, it does not pull in the
>> provided dependencies.
>>
>> This is sort of what I was getting at before, Chris. The provided jars
>> don't get pulled in/referenced when they are marked as provided. For
>> external dependencies, that totally makes sense. But I don't know why we
>> need to mark other accumulo parts as provided. I find it difficult to
>> believe that that is a standard maven configuration. It is extremely
>> painful for downstream clients.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Jim Klucar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> The question mark was in my statement because I didn't actually know if it
>>> created a circular dependency. It appears that Corey found it doesn't have
>>> one. All I did was put a dependency on accumulo-master and saw that when I
>>> did so, Maven didn't pull accumulo-start for me. From my understanding,
>>> that is the whole point of Maven, to handle the sub-dependencies of what
>>> I'm trying to use and when I tried to use MiniAccumuloCluster, it didn't
>>> pull all the right dependencies.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Corey Nolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I take that back- the start module does not have an explicit dependency
>>> on
>>> > accumulo-server. As long as the Main.class is used from the assembly
>>> > artifact's classpath, everything should work fine.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Corey Nolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > The only part that makes a circular dependency is including the
>>> > > MiniAccumuloRunner in the Main.class. I'm not sure if that warrants
>>> > needing
>>> > > to rearchitect the runner, since it was made to give users the ability
>>> to
>>> > > interact with the Miniaccumulocluster as a single node accumulo. It was
>>> > > also made to make the maven plugin much easier and standardize the
>>> > > interface. Seems like two options are to remove the runner option from
>>> > the
>>> > > Main.class or move it to the start module.
>>> > >
>>> > > Personally, I'd opt for moving the runner to the start module.
>>> > > On May 20, 2013 8:12 AM, "David Medinets" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Combine this work with Dave Marion's work and put MiniAccumuloRunner
>>> > into
>>> > >> an add-on script?
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Corey Nolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > I think the ability to run "./bin/accumulo mini" may have introduced
>>> > >> this
>>> > >> > circular dependency. Perhaps the MiniAccumuloRunner should be moved
>>> > >> > somewhere else.
>>> > >> > On May 20, 2013 12:07 AM, "Christopher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > > What do you mean there isn't a way to know this? Doesn't the
>>> server
>>> > >> > > POM express the dependency on start, explicitly?
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > How are you executing MiniAccumuloCluster when you get this error?
>>> > I'm
>>> > >> > > guessing you have a project with a dependency on
>>> "accumulo-server"?
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > Can you elaborate more on this circular dependency risk you
>>> mention?
>>> > >> > > I'm not sure how "accumulo-server" depending on "accumulo-start"
>>> is
>>> > a
>>> > >> > > circular dependency. Are you suggesting "accumulo-start" also has
>>> a
>>> > >> > > dependency on "accumulo-server"? Because... it shouldn't...