Ahmed Eldawy 2013-06-04, 18:31
Mehmet Tepedelenlioglu 2013-06-04, 18:46
-Re: A UDF that is both Algebraic and Accumulator
Ahmed Eldawy 2013-06-04, 18:59
I wrote a function that is both Algebraic and Accumulator. I tested it on a
small dataset and it used only the algebraic interface. When I removed the
statements "implemented Algebraic" and left only the accumulator interface,
it called it. So, I need to know how it decides which one to use.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Mehmet Tepedelenlioglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> It uses both. They are not contradictory.
> From: Ahmed Eldawy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 11:31 AM
> Subject: A UDF that is both Algebraic and Accumulator
> In the Apache Pig documentation, it is mentioned that we can define a UDF
> as both Algebraic and Accumulator
> If I do such a thing, how Pig decides which interface of them to use. I
> assume they are completely separate and they cannot be mixed with each
> other. Is there a way to enforce Pig to prefer one of them over the other?
> Best regards,
> Ahmed Eldawy
Jonathan Coveney 2013-06-04, 20:24