Sangjin Lee 2013-12-02, 19:47
+1 for the idea. The branch committership clause was added for exactly
this kind of scenario.
>From the phrasing in the bylaws, it looks like we'll need assistance from
PMC to get the ball rolling. Is there a PMC member out there who could
volunteer to help start the process with Sangjin?
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Sangjin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have been having discussions on HADOOP-9639 (shared cache for jars) and
> the proposed design there for some time now. We are going to start work on
> this and have it vetted and reviewed by the community. I have just filed
> some more implementation JIRAs for this feature: YARN-1465, MAPREDUCE-5662,
> YARN-1466, YARN-1467
> Rather than working privately in our corner and sharing a big patch at the
> end, I'd like to explore the idea of developing on a branch in the public
> to foster more public feedback. Recently the Hadoop PMC has passed the
> change to the bylaws to allow for branch committers (
> and I think it would be a good model for this development.
> I'd like to propose a branch development and a branch committer status for
> a couple of us who are going to work on this per bylaw. Could you please
> let me know what you think?
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Alejandro Abdelnur 2013-12-06, 19:52
Eli Collins 2013-12-06, 19:56