Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase, mail # dev - recent 0.94 failures


+
lars hofhansl 2013-01-24, 04:03
+
Ted Yu 2013-01-24, 04:07
+
Ted Yu 2013-01-24, 04:34
+
lars hofhansl 2013-01-24, 05:26
+
lars hofhansl 2013-01-25, 07:16
Copy link to this message
-
Re: recent 0.94 failures
Ted Yu 2013-01-25, 15:11
Looking at https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94/771/console :

[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 44:01.553s
FYI
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:16 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Got a lot of failed tests that I have not seen failing at before.
> It looks like the test VMs collectively got slower. Testtimes are up from
> ~45mins to ~70mins
>
> Lots the recent failures are because of tests timing out.
>
>
> -- Lars
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 9:26 PM
> Subject: Re: recent 0.94 failures
>
> Hmm... Also got a successful run now.
> Maybe it was a temporary env issue. It is just strange that the same test
> would fail twice in a row suddenly, along with other test that have not
> failed in a while.
>
> Looking at the runtime of TestMiniClusterLoadParallel on Ubuntu1 it tooK
> 104s. In the latest run on Ubuntu5 it took 292s.
> In the failed runs it over 500s.
>
> -- Lars
> ________________________________
> From: Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 8:34 PM
> Subject: Re: recent 0.94 failures
>
> I ran the tests 4 rounds and they all passed:
> 1046  ~/runtest.sh 4
>
> TestLruBlockCache,TestMiniClusterLoadParallel,TestLruBlockCache,TestCompactionState,TestRSKilledWhenMasterInitializing
>
> FYI
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Lars:
> > Here is what I put in HBASE-7638:
> >
> > Sergey and I looked at the patch.
> > There is no potential for NullPointerException similar to what HBASE-7268
> > addendum fixes.
> > See deleteCachedLocation():
> > {code}
> >           if (oldLocation != null) {
> >             isStaleDelete = (source != null) &&
> > !oldLocation.equals(source);
> > {code}
> > I also ran the tests that failed in recent 0.94 builds and they all
> passed:
> >
> >  1041  mt -Dtest=TestLruBlockCache,TestMiniClusterLoadParallel
> >  1042  mt -Dtest=TestLruBlockCache
> >  1043  mt -Dtest=TestCompactionState
> >  1044  mt -Dtest=TestRSKilledWhenMasterInitializing
> >
> > I would also loop the above tests to see if I can get test failure.
> >
> > I understand it is important to have a green 0.94 build. So whether /
> what
> > to roll back is up to you.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:03 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94/
> >>
> >>
> >> Prime suspects are: HBASE-7599 (Devaraj), and HBASE-7638 (Sergey).
> >> If anybody has any ideas.
> >>
> >> Otherwise I'll start with reverting these changes.
> >>
> >> -- Lars
> >>
> >
> >
>
+
lars hofhansl 2013-01-25, 22:02
+
Sergey Shelukhin 2013-01-25, 22:37
+
lars hofhansl 2013-01-26, 06:21