Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Hadoop >> mail # user >> When applying a patch, which attachment should I use?


Copy link to this message
-
Re: When applying a patch, which attachment should I use?
I am not familiar with this whole svn and patch stuff, so please understand
my asking.

I was going to apply
hdfs-630-0.20-append.patch<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12446812/hdfs-630-0.20-append.patch>
only
because I wanted to install HBase and the installation guide told me to.
The append branch you mentioned, does that include
hdfs-630-0.20-append.patch<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12446812/hdfs-630-0.20-append.patch>
as
well?
Is it like the latest patch with all the good stuff packed in one?

Regards,
Ed

2011/1/12 Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> You may also be interested in the append branch:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/common/branches/branch-0.20-append/
>
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 3:12 AM, edward choi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the info.
> > I am currently using Hadoop 0.20.2, so I guess I only need apply
> > hdfs-630-0.20-append.patch<
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12446812/hdfs-630-0.20-append.patch
> > >
> > .
> > I wasn't familiar with the term "trunk". I guess it means "the latest
> > development".
> > Thanks again.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Ed
> >
> > 2011/1/11 Konstantin Boudnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > Yeah, that's pretty crazy all right. In your case looks like that 3
> > > patches on the top are the latest for 0.20-append branch, 0.21 branch
> > > and trunk (which perhaps 0.22 branch at the moment). It doesn't look
> > > like you need to apply all of them - just try the latest for your
> > > particular branch.
> > >
> > > The mess is caused by the fact the ppl are using different names for
> > > consequent patches (as in file.1.patch, file.2.patch etc) This is
> > > _very_ confusing indeed, especially when different contributors work
> > > on the same fix/feature.
> > > --
> > >   Take care,
> > > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 01:10, edward choi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > For the first time I am about to apply a patch to HDFS.
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-630
> > > >
> > > > Above is the one that I am trying to do.
> > > > But there are like 15 patches and I don't know which one to use.
> > > >
> > > > Could anyone tell me if I need to apply them all or just the one at
> the
> > > top?
> > > >
> > > > The whole patching process is just so confusing :-(
> > > >
> > > > Ed
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB