Michi Mutsuzaki 2012-07-10, 23:59
Camille Fournier 2012-07-11, 03:35
You`re right. I think the original fix went into 3.3, and the fix
based on Ben's suggestion that changes the API semantics went only to
I'll open a separate jira for the issue I'm seeing in 3.3.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Camille Fournier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As the JIRA says, my understanding was that this only should apply to 3.4+
> when I applied this patch. Does that not make sense with what's released in
> 3.3.X? I don't really remember the details here well.
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> ZOOKEEPER-1046 is marked fixed in 3.3.4 and 3.4.0, but it looks like
>> this patch only went in to 3.4.0
>> Was it intentional, or did we forget to backport it to 3.3.4? I'm
>> interested in this fix in particular:
>> I think I'm hitting the bug where parent znode has been already been
>> deleted by the time incrementCversion() gets called on it.