Hi and thank you for the answers. I didn't check the email and now I see 7
answers. It is really great.
Let me explain in more details why I am asking so strange question :-)
As I wrote before I write to HBase using Hadoop Job. Actually the writing
process executes in reducers part of HADOOP job.
Assuming that I have 3 reducers (all of them writes to HBase) and suppose 1
reducer and 3 reducer has the same key.
In this case I need to check: does HBase already contains such key ( it
required select operation from HBase). If yes I have to merge already
inserted record and after that writes it back to HBase. BUT in my case
information organized in such way that I have no problem with the same keys.
So I can save expensive HBase select operation , meaning using only insert
operations. But in order to use only insert operation I need to know that
every and every reducer have unique output key ( K3 is unique output key
for every and every reducer)
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:40 AM, James Seigel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you wanting to have them in different reducers? If so then you can
> write a Comparable object to make that happen.
> If you want them to be on the same reducer, then that is what hadoop will
> On 2010-06-09, at 3:06 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> > Can you disclose more about how K3 is generated.
> > From your description below, it is possible.
> > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Oleg Ruchovets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Hi ,
> >> My hadoop job writes results of map/reduce to HBase.
> >> I have 3 reducers.
> >> Here is a sequence of input and output parameters for Mapper , Combiner
> >> Reducer
> >> *input: InputFormat<K1,V1>
> >> mapper: Mapper<K1,V1,K2,V2>
> >> combiner: Reducer<K2,V2,K2,V2>
> >> reducer: Reducer<K2,V2,K3,V3>
> >> output: RecordWriter<K3,V3>
> >> *My question:
> >> Is it possible that more than one reducer has the same output key K3.
> >> Meaning in case I have 3 reducers is it possible that
> >> reducer1 K3 -* 1* , V3 [1,2,3]
> >> reducer2 K3 - 2 , V3 [5,6,9]
> >> reducer3 K3 - *1* , V3 [10,15,22]
> >> As you can see reducer1 has K3 - 1 and reducer3 has K3 - 1.
> >> So is that case possible or every and every reducer has unique output
> >> Thanks in advance
> >> Oleg.