Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo >> mail # user >> TimestampFilter Performance [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]


Copy link to this message
-
TimestampFilter Performance [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
UNOFFICIAL

Is the TimestampFilter an efficient means of filtering results by time ranges?  I have the option of extending the existing rowid's, currently pre-fixed with yyyymmdd, to include hhmm also, or make use of the TimestampFilter.  In a quick google search someone mentioned that the TimestampFilter was inefficient is this correct?

Matt
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB