-Re: HBase get from within UDF vs. PIG FILTER
Raghu Angadi 2011-08-19, 16:30
UDF could be faster some of the accesses. We do use a lookup UDF in some of
Looking up 6% of the rows might be a bit high for some tables.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Norbert Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> I have a need within a larger Pig script to pull just a few records from an
> Hbase table. I know the exact key, so it'd be trivial with a get() from a
> UDF. Another alternative is use to a custom LOAD/FILTER combo, but this
> would involve filtering off all but 3 of about 50 records.
> From a performance angle, punting over to the UDF is faster, right?
> Although it seems to break the model of only using UDFs when necessary...
> How are others handling this situation?