Sounds like great stuff, Andrei. Do you have a description of the faults you have injected I can access?
On Jul 2, 2012, at 10:14 PM, Andrei Savu wrote:
> I was unable to find any issues so far. It seems like ZooKeeper does a
> great job at
> handling network failures.
> This tool is deploying a ZooKeeper cluster on a cloud provider using Whirr
> with Byteman  (attached to the JVM).
> Faults are injected by using Byteman rules. See this tutorial:
> I am planning to improve the tool to have the ability o inject arbitrary
> rules through the web UI.
> As an workload generator I am using a distributed queue implementation
> that's handling
> ConnectionLoss by retrying to post the message (duplicates are acceptable
> when measuring the latency).
>  http://www.jboss.org/byteman/
> -- Andrei Savu
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sounds interesting but it's not clear to me from the provided docs
>> what it does and what am I expected to do? (canned tests or a
>> framework for me to use). Have you been able to find any issues using
>> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Andrei Savu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>> As part of my MSc. project I have spent some time working on a tool for
>>> fault injection testing for Apache ZooKeeper based on jboss Byteman and
>>> Apache Whirr.
>>> You can find the code on Github:
>>> Do you think this can be an useful addition to contrib? (a version
>> that's a
>>> bit more generic)
>>> -- Andrei Savu / axemblr.com / Tools for Clouds