Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # dev >> Next big thing for HBase

Copy link to this message
Re: Next big thing for HBase

Yeah, sorry, wasn't clear.
Your point is well taken, though, HBase should come configured and tuned out of the box for common workloads.

-- Lars

 From: Vladimir Rodionov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 12:01 AM
Subject: Re: Next big thing for HBase

Oh, I got it. "Next big thing for HBase" is not MapR M7 , but global
optimization and tuning of HBase itself.

On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Vladimir Rodionov

> Why do you think I got excited? I do not work for MapR. MapR has posted
> benchmark results and some numbers for HBase look quite low. I thought may
> be community will be interested in these results.
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:04 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Excuse me if I do not get too exited about a report published by MapR
>> that comes to the conclusion that MapR's M7 is faster than "other
>> distribution".
>> -- Lars
>> ________________________________
>>  From: Vladimir Rodionov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 8:00 PM
>> Subject: Next big thing for HBase
>> Global optimization and performance tuning:
>> http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=19&ved=0CG8QFjAIOAo&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mapr.com%2FDownload-document%2F52-MapR-M7-Performance-Benchmark&ei=QGuVUr-cA6ewjAL_94DoCQ&usg=AFQjCNH2Brlp5n2rIAarEbj39c_X_lnvDg&sig2=bLTKxbspEgsRN3bJXUnspQ&bvm=bv.57155469,d.cGE&cad=rja
>> Some numbers from this report does not look right for HBase. I do not
>> believe that 5 RS on Fusion drive scores only 1605 reads per sec per node.