Pamecha, Abhishek 2012-10-15, 22:00
lars hofhansl 2012-10-16, 04:43
-Re: hbase deployment using VMs for data nodes and SAN for data storage
Pamecha, Abhishek 2012-10-16, 06:07
May be I didn't understand your question. Do you mean SAN overshadows some of the hbase benefits? I thought SAN isn't a great choice for hbase deployments because of concentration of iops to a single device and thus losing out on parallelism and redundancy -- but I am no expert on SANs.
Anyways, to answer your question directly, we wanted to leverage the flexible keyvalue based schema, ability to have a reliable MR type batch jobs infrastructure for analytics and the linear scalability advantages of hbase.
i Sent from my iPad with iMstakes
On Oct 15, 2012, at 21:46, "lars hofhansl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you have a SAN, why would you want to use HBase?
From: "Pamecha, Abhishek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 3:00 PM
Subject: hbase deployment using VMs for data nodes and SAN for data storage
We are deciding between using local disks for bare metal hosts Vs VMs using SAN for data storage. I was wondering if anyone has contrasted performance, availability and scalability between these two options?
IMO, This is kinda similar to a typical AWS or another cloud deployment.
Michael Segel 2012-10-18, 08:39