Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Hadoop, mail # general - Heads Up - hadoop-2.0.3 release


Copy link to this message
-
Re: Heads Up - hadoop-2.0.3 release
Robert Evans 2012-11-19, 16:27
We really need https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-4805 too.
The history server is completely useless without it.

--Bobby

On 11/16/12 10:27 PM, "Alejandro Abdelnur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Agree with Milind, I'd also like to see MAPREDUCE-2454 in it.
>
>Thx
>
>On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Bhandarkar, Milind
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I would recommend https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-2454
>>for
>> inclusion.
>>
>> - milind
>>
>> ---
>> Milind Bhandarkar
>> Chief Scientist,
>> Machine Learning Platforms,
>> Greenplum, A Division of EMC
>> +1-650-523-3858 (W)
>> +1-408-666-8483 (C)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/16/12 3:38 PM, "Aaron T. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi Arun,
>>>
>>>Given that the 2.0.3 release is intended to reflect the growing
>>>stability
>>>of YARN, and the QJM work will be included in 2.0.3 which provides a
>>>complete HDFS HA solution, I think it's time we consider removing the
>>>"-alpha" label from the release version. My preference would be to
>>>remove
>>>the label entirely, but we could also perhaps call it "-beta" or
>>>something.
>>>
>>>Thoughts?
>>>
>>>--
>>>Aaron T. Myers
>>>Software Engineer, Cloudera
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>> On the heels of the planned 0.23.5 release (thanks Bobby & Thomas) I
>>>>want
>>>> to rollout a hadoop-2.0.3 release to reflect the growing stability of
>>>>YARN.
>>>>
>>>> I'm hoping we can also release the QJM along-with; hence I'd love to
>>>>know
>>>> an ETA - Todd? Sanjay? Suresh?
>>>>
>>>> One other thing which would be nice henceforth is to better reflect
>>>> release content for end-users in release-notes etc.; thus, can I ask
>>>> committers to start paying closer attention to bug classification such
>>>>as
>>>> Blocker/Critical/Major/Minor etc.? This way, as we get closer to
>>>>stable
>>>> hadoop-2 releases, we can do a better job communicating content and
>>>>it's
>>>> criticality.
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>> Arun
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Alejandro