Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # dev >> Re: 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT conflicting with hbase-proto 0.96.x


Copy link to this message
-
Re: 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT conflicting with hbase-proto 0.96.x
So is the suggestion to just add the other signature to hbase's version?

We recently ran into another problem due to this ZeroCopy class --
shouldn't it really be pushed into protobuf, or pulled out as a separate
jar of some sort.  We ran into into class path/class loader problems with
it because if subclasses a com.google.protobuf class (out of a package).

Jon.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 8:35 AM, tsuna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:02 AM, Nicolas Liochon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Should we not rename ZeroCopyLiteralByteString to something like
> > HBasePrivateZeroCopyLiteralByteString to be sure that we won't have name
> > conflicts in the future?
>
> I don't mind keeping the same name as long as we agree on the API.
> I don't expect this class to change much if at all anyway.  It's just
> really unfortunate that this method was changed, what's more with a
> signature that renders it unusable.
>
> --
> Benoit "tsuna" Sigoure
>

--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// [EMAIL PROTECTED] // @jmhsieh

 
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB