Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # user >> Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.0 release candidate is available for download


Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.0 release candidate is available for download
Binary API compatibility is not a criteria for 0.98 release, as mentioned
prominently in both RC announcements. In fact, we accepted patches that
specifically break it with that in mind.
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Aleksandr Shulman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Sorry to join the party a little late. I have two pieces of feedback for
> the RC. Because of 2.1 and 2.2, I am also -1 on this RC.
>
> 1. Smoke tests - I ran the standard internal smoke tests - they all passed.
> 2. Binary/API incompatibilities:
>   1. Scan.setSmall(boolean) return type changed, which will cause a binary
> incompatibility between 0.96 and 0.98
>   2. HTableDescriptor.isDeferredLogFlush was removed, which will cause a
> binary incompatibility between 0.96 and 0.98. We should add it back with
> default response of 'true'
>   3. KeyValue constructors removed (known issue, but we should make sure to
> document)
>   4. ServerName constructors removed (known issue, but we should make sure
> to document)
>
> For 2.1 and 2.2:
>
>
> Exception from testScanMeta:  -> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.Scan.setSmall(Z)V
>
>
> Exception from testIsDeferredLogFlush:  ->
> java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.HTableDescriptor.isDeferredLogFlush()Z
>
>
> The full report of Public API diffs can be found here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jmhsieh/hbase_jdiff_report-p-0.96-c-0.98/changes.html
> I will continue examining the report and I'd encourage folks to do the
> same.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 7:04 PM, tsuna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry I didn't mean to sink the RC just for this.
> >
> >
> > Well I think we should not be obnoxious in that way even if unintended.
> > However, HBASE-10433 would also have sunk the RC if it makes you feel
> > better. :-)
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> Aleks Shulman
> 847.814.5804
> Cloudera
>

--
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)