Hi, I've got a question about Spillable Memory Channel in flume 1.5 Is there any chance to get the support for this in flume embedded agent in future release? I assume, that its not currently supported.
In addition, currently this feature is marked as "experimental". Will this feature turn to production ready in the next release?
I think it should be possible to support Spill channel in embedded agent also.
I think dropping of the "experimental" label on it should get discussed before the next release. It probably will include reviewing reported issues with Spill channel.
Have you had a chance to use Spill Channel ?
-roshan On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Mark Bramnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete it from your system. Thank You.
I think that Embedded Agent restricts the channels to be Memory Channel or File Channel (it is hardcoded). We would need to fix Embedded agent to support the Spillable Channel. Thanks, Hari On Jul 17, 2014, at 2:03 PM, Roshan Naik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
According to the documentation Hari Shreedharan is totally right, Embedded Agent indeed supports only memory ad file channel. So it really could be great to support the spillable channel in the next release for embedded agent as well. I'm failry new to this, should I open a ticket in JIRA?
2 Roshan: I've started to check this channel, currently at the level of POC. I haven't done any performance / stress tests on it yet though in our system.
Thanks, Mark On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Hari Shreedharan < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: