-Re: [DISCUSSION] Finishing up 0.96 --> WAS Re: 0.95 and 0.96 remaining issues
bq. Francis' namespaces is in need of review
I plan to review this feature.
The latest update to https://github.com/francisliu/hbase_namespace lagged
the last comment on HBASE-8015
I wonder if there are more significant changes to be made.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A few of us have been working on broke junit tests. Progress is slow but
> steady. Currently I am looking into zombie tests -- "all" tests complete
> but the build still fails. Andrew Purtell has set me up w/ a clone box
> from his ec2 rig which is helping figure the zombie phenomenon. I also
> just added our hadoopqa zombie detector up on apache trunk build to see if
> it yields clues at nkeywals' suggestion. I also need to fix
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8764 so the ec2 integration
> test build passes (ec2 build runs integration tests which apache build does
> Francis' namespaces is in need of review as are other 'Patch Available'
> criticals that we'd like committed such as Sergey's compaction changes. If
> any volunteers are game, see the 'patch available' issues here .
> Contrib appreciated.
> I know of at least one rig that is going up to do long-term hbase-it tests.
> Any other testing going on that folks would like to talk up?
> Testing and finish documentation on moving from 0.94 pedigree to 0.96.
> Still TODO.
> Making it so we can publish an hbase 0.96 built against hadoop1 and
> hadoop2. Still TODO.
> What else?
> I am still heading for end of July for a complete '0.96'.
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am shooting for end of July for 0.96 being 'complete'. I would like
> > make a 0.96 release in August. We have some criticals outstanding but I
> > think we could ship even if these are not fixed in time (excepting
> > migration polish and of course remaining build fixes). See [1.] for the
> > current list of issues. Please re-prioritize issues as you see fit (or
> > better, move issues out of 0.95.2 if you do not think they will be done
> > time).
> > What to do with namespaces -- the last 0.96 'feature' -- given the above
> > timeline? Currently it is a massive patch out on a branch. It is still
> > not done, in want of review, and the author is going on holidays for a
> > weeks soon. My thinking as of now, going by the rate of change over the
> > last few weeks and estimating what is yet to be done, is that namespaces
> > will not make it. I am willing to be convinced otherwise but that is how
> > it looks to me currently.
> > I am going to start just disabling flakey unit tests in 0.95 from here on
> > out. When folks get the itch, they can fix at leisure first on trunk and
> > then over in 0.95.
> > What else?
> > Thanks,
> > St.Ack
> > 1.
> > On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> (Changed the subject)
> >> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> I want to see initial data type APIs ship out with 0.95.2. A patch for
> >>> ordered byte serialization is up (HBASE-8201) and is nearing
> >>> steady-state.
> >>> However, sershe is the only person who's left feedback. I just posted
> >>> early patch for the data type API itself (HBASE-8693). It should get
> >>> eyes from all manor of interested parties, but I'll settle for folk
> >>> Phoenix for now.
> >> It would be cool if Phoenix and Kiji fellows and any one else interested
> >> would weigh in and take a look see.