Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Pig >> mail # dev >> pig 0.11 candidate 2 feedback: Several problems


Copy link to this message
-
Re: pig 0.11 candidate 2 feedback: Several problems
I think someone should step up and fix the easy ones, if possible.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Thanks Kai for reporting these.
>
> What do people think about the severity of these issues w.r.t. Pig 11? I
> see a few possible options:
>
> 1. We include some or all of these patches in a new Pig 11 rc. We'd want to
> make sure that they don't destabilize the current branch. This approach
> makes sense if we think Pig 11 wouldn't be a good release without one or
> more of these included.
>
> 2. We continue with the Pig 11 release without these, but then include one
> or more in a 0.11.1 release.
>
> 3. We continue with the Pig 11 release without these, but then include them
> in a 0.12 release.
>
> Jon has a patch for the MAP issue
> (PIG-3144<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3144>)
> ready, which seems like the most pressing of the three to me.
>
> thanks,
> Bill
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 2:27 AM, Kai Londenberg <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just subscribed to the dev mailing list in order to give you some
> > feedback on pig 0.11 candidate 2.
> >
> > The following three issues are currently present in 0.11 candidate 2:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3144 - 'Erroneous map entry
> > alias resolution leading to "Duplicate schema alias" errors'
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3194 - Changes to
> > ObjectSerializer.java break compatibility with Hadoop 0.20.2
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-3195 - Race Condition in
> > PhysicalOperator leads to ExecException "Error while trying to get
> > next result in POStream"
> >
> > The last two of these are easily solveable (see the tickets for
> > details on that). The first one is a bit trickier I think, but at
> > least there is a workaround for it (pass Map fields through an UDF)
> >
> > In my personal opinion, each of these problems is pretty severe, but
> > opinions about the importance of the MAP Datatype and STREAM Operator,
> > as well as Hadoop 0.20.2 compatibility might differ.
> >
> > so far ..
> >
> > Kai Londenberg
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please email me at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] going forward.*
>

--
Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney [EMAIL PROTECTED] datasyndrome.com