zookeeper use zad not paxos ,so here is discuss zad :)
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Flavio Junqueira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Did you mean to say zab instead of paxos?
> On Sep 6, 2013, at 6:11 AM, Martin Kou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The follower doesn't persist in the beginning - not until it's sure it
> had the consensus of the quorum. Also, the client only talks to the node it
> is connected to.
> > The general algorithm you're looking for here is Paxos. You may want to
> look that up.
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >> On Sep 3, 2013, at 11:54 PM, ch huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> hi,all:
> >> i am very confused about the write sync process,what i thank is
> >> ,client connect to one of follower ,send a update request to it,and the
> >> follower persisted the update to it's disk ,then forward this request to
> >> the leader,the leader broadcast it to all it's follower, if the leader
> >> responce of the majority of all follower say the update succeed, it
> >> the update ,and the client will get success response (from who? the
> >> or the follower who connected?)
> >> so before leader persisted the change ,this change should be persisted
> >> majority of followers ?
> >> what i think is right??