Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo >> mail # user >> how to use CountingIterator to count records?

Copy link to this message
RE: how to use CountingIterator to count records?

If you have access to the ingest of this data, have you considered implementing an Edge Table to keep the count based on a document partition index (or similar aggregate key)?  I have to keep up with the same statistic and have moved to the Edge Table approach for a direct look up of occurrences.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 13:03
Subject: Re: how to use CountingIterator to count records?

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:46 PM, William Slacum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're kind of there. Essentially, you can think of your Scanner's
> interactions with the TServers as a tree with a height of two. Your

One comment to add.  The Scanner will do this work serially, one tablet server at a time.  The batch scanner would execute the iterator in parallel on multiple tablet servers at a time.
> Scanner is the "root" and its children are all of the TServers it
> needs to interact with. Essentially, the operation you'd want to is
> sum the number of records each of the children have.
> In Accumulo terms, you can use something like a CountingIterator to
> count the number of results on each TServer. You can then sum all of
> those intermediate results to get a total count of results.
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Hunter Provyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I want to know the number of records a scanner has without actually
>> getting the records from cloudbase.
>> I've been looking at CountingIterator (1.3.4), which has a getCount()
>> method.  However, I don't know how to access the instance to call
>> getCount() on it because Cloudbase server just passes back the
>> entries and doesn't expose the instance of the iterator.
>> It is possible to use an AggregatingIterator to aggregate all entries
>> into a single entry whose value is the number of entries.  But I was
>> wondering if there was a better way that possibly makes use of the
>> CountingIterator class.