I've included references inline for your convenience. I'll once again
[strongly] suggest you guys remove that artifact.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Tim,
> There is LICENSE.txt and NOTICES.txt in both source and binary package. In
> the binary package, the files are located in $PREFIX/share/doc/chukwa to
> match what standard Linux file system layout. We voted for source release
> and there is no Apache restriction that a source release, can not procedure
> a binary package.
"Votes on whether a package is ready to be released use majority
approval -- i.e., at least three PMC members must vote affirmatively
for release, and there must be more positive than negative votes."
Each vote is on signed, hashed artifacts, so yes, if you say it's a
"source vote" then no binary should accompany it.
> There is also no restriction that binary release must
> have LICENSE.txt and NOTICES.txt in the top level directory.
How do you reach that understanding from the sentence below?
"Every Apache distribution should include a NOTICE file in the top
directory, along with the standard LICENSE file."
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Tim Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Maybe my subscription was confirmed yet the first time I sent this...
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> Hi Chukwa devs,
>> I noticed you have a binary convenience artifact in the release
>> location that doesn't have a LICENSE or a NOTICE in it. In looking
>> back at the release vote, it seems like you chose to only vote a
>> source release (admittedly easier).
>> You can't vote on a source-only release and then also release the
>> binary artifact. I think you guys should remove the binary from dist.
>> Then, there's the potential that I'm missing something here, in which
>> case, I'd appreciate an explanation:)
>>  - http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/chukwa/chukwa-0.5.0/
>>  -
>>  -