Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Zookeeper >> mail # user >> [Release 3.5.0] Any news yet?

Copy link to this message
RE: [Release 3.5.0] Any news yet?
I'm not against having ZK-1147 in, but I'm not sure why that's a blocker.
ZK-1549 is a blocker for me, and there are other 5 currently marked as

Bug ZOOKEEPER-1667 Watch event isn't handled correctly when a client
reestablish to a server
Bug ZOOKEEPER-1551 Observer ignore txns that comes after snapshot and
Bug ZOOKEEPER-1549 Data inconsistency when follower is receiving a DIFF
with a dirty snapshot
Bug ZOOKEEPER-1159 ClientCnxn does not propagate session expiration
Bug ZOOKEEPER-984 jenkins failure in testSessionMoved - NPE in quorum

Bug ZOOKEEPER-871 ClientTest testClientCleanup is failing due to high
fd count.

I'm not sure about the last three, so it would be good if we could revisit
those. I think the first three need to get in.


-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 July 2013 17:50
To: UserZooKeeper; DevZooKeeper
Subject: Re: [Release 3.5.0] Any news yet?

I'd like to see a 3.5.0-alpha soon. I agree re 1147 and iirc it was pretty
close (Mahadev?). ZOOKEEPER-1346 (jetty support for monitoring) should also
go in. It's pretty much ready afair.

I'm happy to RM 3.5 if we can get past these open issues.

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi Stefan,
> On 9 July 2013 08:13, Stefan Egli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> We're evaluating using ZooKeeper, and esp the embedded mode
(ZOOKEEPER-107 - [0]), for an implementation of the Sling Discovery API
([1]). Since ZOOKEEPER-107 is planned for 3.5.0 I was wondering what the
release schedule of 3.5.0 is, or any plan thereof? (I saw a discussion about
releasing it from Dec 2012 [1]).
> I think as of now the biggest blocker is:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1147
> Besides needing a final review it needs better documentation and an
> extra small patch (I proposed one) to support rolling updates when
> enabling local sessions.
> Cheers,
> -rgs