Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # dev >> HEADSUP: Working on new 0.96.0RC


Copy link to this message
-
Re: HEADSUP: Working on new 0.96.0RC
> Anyways, if you fellas can't wait anymore, just say and we'll figure out
something.
As I see it, HBASE-9563 is committed, and HBASE-9696 is not a blocker
against 0.96. But if you argue that 9696 is indeed a blocker, let's raise
it as such. There is no point in creating an RC, an immediately sinking it
if we cannot verify the RC for a +1. We don't run into data loss issues
anymore which is why I still think we can release 0.96 even without 9696
and 9724. Nothing is preventing us to release 0.96.1, with this and more
fixes in let's say a couple of weeks or months.

I guess let's wait for tomorrow to see whether there is any progress on
9563 and 9696.

Enis
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Enis Söztutar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>  HBASE-9563 is trivial enough and it is already in 0.96. We may have run
>> that into some point, but not lately. Do you see your tests succeeding
>> with
>> HBASE-9563 and HBASE-9696?
>>
>>
> Both are under test in independent rigs.  For HBASE-9563, we are trying to
> repro the clash of the masters to see if the patch helped.  We've also
> instrumented the rig so we can get more data when we hit the hang again.
>
> Anyways, if you fellas can't wait anymore, just say and we'll figure out
> something.
>
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB