Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2012-11-22, 18:25
Harsh J 2012-11-22, 18:49
Marcos Ortiz 2012-11-22, 19:01
Harsh J 2012-11-22, 19:35
Marcos Ortiz 2012-11-22, 19:44
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2012-11-22, 18:58
-Re: HBase 0.94.x vs Hadoop 2.0.x?
Harsh J 2012-11-22, 19:30
You'd have to recompile against a proper target and produce your own
tarball. I guess binary artifacts would begin shipping with 0.96
>From the root of a 0.94.x release tarball, try Elliot's command from
$ mvn clean package assembly:assembly -DskipTests -Dhadoop.profile=2.0
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification.
> Should I take a specific 0.94.x distribution to work with Hadoop 2.x+
> ? Because there is only one version on
> http://apache.parentingamerica.com/hbase/hbase-0.94.2/ ...
> Or can I just keep my existing HBase confirmation and "simply" upgrade
> my hadoop to 2.x?
> 2012/11/22, Harsh J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> HBase 0.92+ onwards has had support for Apache Hadoop 2.x+ along with
>> Apache Hadoop 1.x.
>> The note on the web manual says that:
>> "As of Apache HBase 0.96.x, Apache Hadoop 1.0.x at least is required.
>> We will no longer run properly on older Hadoops such as 0.20.205 or
>> branch-0.20-append. Do not move to Apache HBase 0.96.x if you cannot
>> upgrade your Hadoop.
>> Apache HBase 0.96.0 runs on Apache Hadoop 2.0."
>> Which means, starting with 0.96, only 2.x Hadoop will be supported and
>> support for 1.x or older Hadoop versions will be dropped (or will not
>> be "properly supported").
>> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:55 PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Is HBase 0.94.x running with Hadoop 2.0.x?
>>> I saw that 0.96.0 will be, but I was wondering for 0.94.x...
>> Harsh J