+1 let's get rid of it for Pete's sake
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 03:16PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> This code has been broken for a long time and, while it's still in use
> in some companies, they've had a long time to offer fixes.
> +1 on abandoning it.
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Eli Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Allen Wittenauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Jul 20, 2011, at 2:55 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
> >>> I don't think we should remove HDFSProxy because Hoop exists, I think
> >>> we should remove it because it's broken and not being maintained.
> >>> Broken and un-maintained code should be removed no?
> >> ═ ═ ═ ═That'd remove large chunks of hadoop.
> > We've made good progress removing broken / unmaintained code from
> > Hadoop. ═Common no longer contains any contrib projects. And HDFS is
> > down to two (hdfs proxy and fuse-dfs, and the latter is actually
> > maintained, by myself and others).
> > Thanks,
> > Eli