-Re: HTable writeAsyncBuffer
Stack 2013-12-09, 23:16
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Koert Kuipers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> are there downsides if we were to add all these operations to the
> writeAsyncBuffer? are there any usages of HTable.put that rely on it being
> send off instead of being put in a buffer?
You can ask for a flush after adding a put if you have such a case (and
there is autoflush flag).