Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase, mail # dev - hadoop 2.0 dependency upgraded to 2.0.3-alpha


+
Ted Yu 2013-02-22, 17:35
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-02-22, 17:55
+
Ted Yu 2013-02-22, 18:04
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-02-22, 18:07
+
Ted Yu 2013-02-22, 18:10
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-02-22, 18:31
+
Ted Yu 2013-02-22, 19:39
+
Ted Yu 2013-02-22, 19:49
+
Stack 2013-02-22, 21:02
+
Ted Yu 2013-02-22, 21:07
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-02-22, 21:12
+
Ted Yu 2013-02-26, 20:03
Copy link to this message
-
Re: hadoop 2.0 dependency upgraded to 2.0.3-alpha
Ted Yu 2013-03-04, 23:56
Here is another blocker for running mapreduce on top hadoop 2.0.3-alpha:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-449

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-429 was logged for this issue.
>
> FYI
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Andrew Purtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> I agree, thanks a lot for doing this.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > bq. to nail down the actual issue will  help making our case.
>> >
>> > That is what I am trying to do. Will ping Arun at the meetup this
>> afternoon
>> > about when the next release is coming.
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Thanks for trying to fix it Ted.  I think we need to carry our
>> difficulty
>> > > back up to our parent project brethren (Sounds like you have done this
>> > > off-list; lets do it in jira/mail too).  Your digging in to nail down
>> the
>> > > actual issue will  help making our case.  Maybe we can get/help the
>> > > upstream crew make another release (I don't see a note on a new 2.0
>> > release
>> > > up on hadoop -- have I missed it)?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > St.Ack
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Trying out #2, I got:
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> testExcludeAllFromMinorCompaction(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestHFileOutputFormat)
>> > > >  Time elapsed: 35.746 sec  <<< FAILURE!
>> > > > java.lang.AssertionError
>> > > >         at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:86)
>> > > >         at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
>> > > >         at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:52)
>> > > >         at
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestHFileOutputFormat.runIncrementalPELoad(TestHFileOutputFormat.java:468)
>> > > >         at
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.mapreduce.TestHFileOutputFormat.testExcludeAllFromMinorCompaction(TestHFileOutputFormat.java:713)
>> > > >
>> > > > Arun Murthy got to know this defect. Another 2.0 release is coming
>> soon
>> > > > (next week, hopefully).
>> > > >
>> > > > I plan to wait for the new release.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > The root cause was the removal of capacity-scheduler.xml<
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/common/branches/branch-2/hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/conf/capacity-scheduler.xml
>> > > >
>> > > > from
>> > > > > 2.0.3-alpha maven artifacts.
>> > > > > This config file is needed to start CapacityScheduler which is the
>> > > > default.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > After talking to Sid, I got two suggestions:
>> > > > > 1. embed minimal capacity-scheduler.xml<
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/common/branches/branch-2/hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/conf/capacity-scheduler.xml
>> > > >
>> > > > in
>> > > > > our src/test/resources
>> > > > > 2. use FiFo scheduler instead which doesn't require presence of
>> > config
>> > > > file
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I think #2, though temporary fix, is easy to change once a future
>> 2.0
>> > > > > release addresses this issue.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Once consensus is reached, I will attach another patch to
>> HBASE-7904
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Cheers
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Andrew Purtell <
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > > > >wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> For minicluster unit tests? In my opinion, no.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> > I can try to find the proper usage.
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > The question is: do we have to maintain compatibility with
+
Ted Yu 2013-03-05, 01:04
+
Andrew Purtell 2013-03-05, 00:10
+
Enis Söztutar 2013-02-22, 19:38
+
ramkrishna vasudevan 2013-02-22, 17:56
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-02-22, 17:53