Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Zookeeper >> mail # dev >> RE: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)


Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Doesn't look good, failed a second time:

https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/

java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect
at org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129)
at org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199)
Patrick

On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good point Ted.
> Eugene,
>  Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat level? :)
>
> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not.
>
> thanks
> mahadev
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down root cause ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the unit
>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also ran
>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to be
>>> working.
>>>
>>> Patrick
>>>
>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> >   I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2 JIRAs are
>>> >  addressed in this release. This includes the critical bugfix
>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550
>>> >  which address the client connection issue.
>>> >
>>> >  *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
>>> >  *** vote closes  12:00  midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.***
>>> >
>>> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little longer so that
>>> > folks get time to test this out.
>>> >
>>> >  http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/
>>> >
>>> >  Should we release this?
>>> >
>>> >  thanks
>>> >  mahadev
>>>