Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Accumulo, mail # dev - Shell documentation appendix


+
Christopher 2013-04-24, 22:04
+
Billie Rinaldi 2013-04-25, 02:09
+
Christopher 2013-04-25, 13:40
+
Christopher 2013-04-25, 13:43
+
Billie Rinaldi 2013-04-25, 14:13
+
David Medinets 2013-04-24, 22:35
+
Josh Elser 2013-04-24, 23:01
+
Keith Turner 2013-04-25, 16:38
+
Billie Rinaldi 2013-04-25, 16:48
+
Keith Turner 2013-04-25, 16:55
+
Christopher 2013-04-25, 18:38
+
Keith Turner 2013-04-25, 18:48
Copy link to this message
-
Re: Shell documentation appendix
Eric Newton 2013-04-25, 18:49
+1 for dropping the appendix and replacing it with a reference to the
shell's built-in help system.

On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +0 for updating the appendix to reflect 1.5.0 commands.
> +1 for dropping the appendix and replacing it with a reference to the
> shell's built-in help system.
> +10 for automatically creating the appendix on each build (if the
> profile is activated), so it doesn't get out of sync again, *if* the
> consensus is to include it.
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Keith Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Billie Rinaldi
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Keith Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I noticed that there's a script that grabs shell output and builds
> an
> >> > > appendix for the user manual PDF. However, that doesn't appear to be
> >> > > automated as part of the documentation build profile.
> >> > >
> >> > > So, the questions are:
> >> > > 1) Do we need this?
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > For 1.5, it seems like we have the following options.
> >> >
> >> >  1. Update it to reflect the commands that exist in 1.5.
> >> >  2. Drop it.
> >> >  3. Leave it as is.
> >> >
> >> > Whats the current status of this documentation?  Is it based on 1.4
> shell
> >> > commands?  If so then, option 3 would mean shipping 1.5 w/
> documentation
> >> > for 1.4 shell commands.  Can option 1 be done quickly for 1.5?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Yes, it can be done easily.  The get_shell_commands script outputs a new
> >> appendix.  I'm happy to do this if we still think the appendix is
> useful.
> >>
> >
> > If its quick and easy to update I think we should just do it for 1.5.  I
> am
> > not sure how we determine if its useful.  One way is to remove it and see
> > if anyone complains.
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > 2) Does it need to be run manually?
> >> > >
> >> > > Also, I guess there's some extra steps to convert the LaTeX source
> for
> >> > > the PDF into HTML... regarding that:
> >> > >
> >> > > 1) are those steps documented anywhere?
> >> > > 2) can we automate that procedure?
> >> > > 3) do we even need it?
> >> > >
> >> > > Personally, I think it'd be better to just do the PDF for now, until
> >> > > we get Doxia or something similar working.
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Christopher L Tubbs II
> >> > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>
+
Billie Rinaldi 2013-04-26, 01:56
+
Christopher 2013-04-26, 02:58