|
|
+
lars hofhansl 2012-03-10, 04:33
+
Harsh J 2012-03-10, 12:23
+
lars hofhansl 2012-03-13, 00:29
+
Stack 2012-03-13, 03:22
+
Dave Wang 2012-03-13, 14:42
-
Re: Commits to 0.94Joey Echeverria 2012-03-13, 01:28
+1
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:29 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think this is a great idea. > > Should we adopt this here? > I'm +1. Who else? > > > -- Lars > > > ________________________________ > From: Harsh J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 4:23 AM > Subject: Re: Commits to 0.94 > > Perhaps HBase JIRA should follow Hadoop JIRA's new way of managing Fix > vs. Targeted branch versions? > > Matt Foley described it for Hadoop at http://search-hadoop.com/m/NARQHPUsiv1 > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 10:03 AM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I have recently seen some commits to trunk-only for jiras that were marked with "Fix Version/s: 0.94.0", and that were subsequently marked as fixed. >> That makes is difficult to track what went into 0.94 by just looking at through the jira issues. >> >> I would like to request to either: >> o also commit to 0.94 (preferred), or >> >> o change Fix Version/s to 0.96, or >> >> o do not mark the jira as fixed (so, I'll see an open issue targeted to 0.94) >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> -- Lars >> > > > > -- > Harsh J -- Joseph Echeverria Cloudera, Inc. 443.305.9434 |