Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Accumulo >> mail # dev >> dependencies within 1.5


Copy link to this message
-
Re: dependencies within 1.5
Seems fine to me as well.

--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:35 PM, John Vines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds good to me
>
>
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Corey Nolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hadoop's module is "hadoop-minicluster" so I'm thinking of making
>> "accumulo-minicluster". I'm also thinking the package should be
>> "o.a.a.minicluster" Any objections?
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 for moving it in 1.5 for all the previous reasons specified.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Christopher L Tubbs II
>> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Keith Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:34 PM, John Vines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> I think we should move it in 1.5. The bug Eric found this morning,
>> along
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > Thats ok w/ me.  I mostly want to avoid the deprecation route.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >> with the laundry list of non-breakers, are enough for an RC5 to be
>> cut.
>> > >> This should be pulled in. Having packages not align with modules
>> causes
>> > >> nothing must frustration and confusion when trying to debug things.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Keith Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Corey Nolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > I think it's worth asking because a few people expressed interest
>> in
>> > >> > moving
>> > >> > > the mini cluster to it's own module. Do we want this for 1.5 or do
>> > we
>> > >> > wait
>> > >> > > until 1.6 and provide a deprecation strategy?
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I think we should move it in 1.5 XOR leave the package name the same
>> > in
>> > >> > 1.6, but move it to another module.  Either way avoids API changes
>> for
>> > >> > users.
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Corey Nolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > > Agreed, they also slow down the build.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Christopher <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >
>> > >> > > wrote:
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> Maybe...  or 'jar-with-dependencies' assembly, or something
>> > similar,
>> > >> > > >> might be useful.
>> > >> > > >> I'd probably argue for it to be in a de-activated profile, by
>> > >> default,
>> > >> > > >> though. Shaded jars can become problematic if people start
>> using
>> > >> them
>> > >> > > >> as dependencies.
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> --
>> > >> > > >> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> > >> > > >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Corey Nolet <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> > > >> > This may be far out into space- but how would you guys feel
>> > about
>> > >> > > >> providing
>> > >> > > >> > a shaded jar in the pom for a new mini module? This may make
>> it
>> > >> > easier
>> > >> > > >> for
>> > >> > > >> > users to run the mini accumulo cluster without
>> hadoop/zookeeper
>> > >> > > >> installed.
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Christopher <
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > >> wrote:
>> > >> > > >> >
>> > >> > > >> >> ACCUMULO-1436 for fixing "provided" dependencies.
>> > >> > > >> >>
>> > >> > > >> >> --
>> > >> > > >> >> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> > >> > > >> >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>> > >> > > >> >>
>> > >> > > >> >>
>> > >> > > >> >> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Christopher <
>> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > >> wrote:
>> > >> > > >> >> > You're right. I'm not sure why our internal dependencies
>> > would
>> > >> be
>> > >> > > >> >> > marked as provided... except maybe I made that mistake to
>> > try
>> > >> to
>> > >> > > deal
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB