Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase, mail # dev - 0.95 branch done (WAS -> Re: Heads-up! Branching 0.96 (actually 0.95) this weekend)


Copy link to this message
-
Re: 0.95 branch done (WAS -> Re: Heads-up! Branching 0.96 (actually 0.95) this weekend)
Ted Yu 2013-02-26, 14:47
I got the following trying to build trunk:

[ERROR] The build could not read 2 projects -> [Help 1]
[ERROR]
[ERROR]   The project org.apache.hbase:hbase-server:0.95-SNAPSHOT
(/Users/tyu/trunk/hbase-server/pom.xml) has 1 error
[ERROR]     'dependencies.dependency.version' for
org.apache.hbase:hbase-prefix-tree:jar is missing. @ line 276, column 17
[ERROR]
[ERROR]   The project org.apache.hbase:hbase-client:0.95-SNAPSHOT
(/Users/tyu/trunk/hbase-client/pom.xml) has 1 error
[ERROR]     'dependencies.dependency.version' for
org.apache.hbase:hbase-prefix-tree:jar is missing. @ line 61, column 21

FYI

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I just branched 0.95 from trunk.
>
> The intent is that we will now let trunk go and drive to make a 0.95.0
> release for folks to bang on so they get to try all the goodness that has
> been baking in trunk.  After 0.95.0 goes out, dependent on feedback, we
> might do a 0.95.1, etc., but all strictly experimental odd-number releases
> that are not for production and we reserve the right to break compatibility
> across 0.95 releases (if we've messed something up).
>
> Once we have confidence that 0.95.0 basically works, and once we have
> figured the migration from 0.94, we'll branch 0.96 from off the 0.95 branch
> and will then stabilize a 0.96.0 release.  All 0.96.x releases will be
> taken from this branch off a branch.
>
> The 0.95 branch is at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/branches/0.95
>
> I set up 0.95 builds for hadoop1 and hadoop2.  They run on same triggers as
> TRUNK builds.
>
> In JIRA, I moved all issues with fix against 0.96.0 to instead be against
> 0.95.0 (Issues marked fix for 0.94 and 0.96 will now just be for 0.95.0 --
> JIRA wouldn't let me do any different; sorry about that).  This means
> 0.96.0 now has no issues against it.
>
> Let me know if I messed anything up.
>
> Thanks,
> St.Ack
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > All the big code moves are done.  Let me branch now.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> You the man Elliott.  This is a big code move  so would be good to have
> >> this side of the branch.  If you can't do it on the w/e, we can do it
> >> post-branch too.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> St.Ack
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Elliott Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'll try and get that to you tonight or at least this weekend so you
> can
> >>> branch on schedule.
> >>> On Feb 22, 2013 4:30 PM, "Stack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Elliott Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Stack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > When we think APIs and wire-format sufficiently stabilized, we'll
> >>> then
> >>> > > cut
> >>> > > > a 0.96 from the 0.95 branch and release 0.96.0, etc., from here
> on
> >>> out.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > We need to do the client move before the branch.  Other than that
> >>> sounds
> >>> > > good.
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > You waiting on me (rpc) Elliott?  If so, don't I'd say.  I can rebase
> >>> no
> >>> > problem and I don't see the last part of the rpc going in until it
> has
> >>> had
> >>> > a good bit more review and a bit of profiling done.
> >>> >
> >>> > Agree would be nice getting client refactor in before branch.  Its a
> >>> big
> >>> > code move.
> >>> >
> >>> > St.Ack
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>