Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Zookeeper >> mail # dev >> Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)


+
Hanno Schlichting 2012-10-02, 15:20
+
Michi Mutsuzaki 2012-10-02, 19:35
+
Stack 2012-10-02, 05:40
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-04, 06:34
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-04, 23:13
+
Ted Yu 2012-10-04, 23:10
+
Mahadev Konar 2012-10-04, 23:15
+
Ted Yu 2012-10-05, 00:04
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-05, 00:07
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-05, 06:17
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-05, 16:56
+
Ted Yu 2012-10-06, 03:55
+
Ted Yu 2012-10-06, 03:58
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-06, 14:06
+
Ted Yu 2012-10-06, 14:16
+
Ted Yu 2012-10-06, 21:25
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-07, 13:56
+
Ted Yu 2012-10-07, 15:34
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-08, 05:17
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-08, 16:05
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-08, 23:17
+
Mahadev Konar 2012-10-08, 05:05
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-08, 05:19
+
Flavio Junqueira 2012-10-10, 16:04
+
Mahadev Konar 2012-10-11, 05:38
+
Alexander Shraer 2012-10-11, 21:42
+
Mahadev Konar 2012-10-11, 21:45
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.4.5 (candidate 0)
Patch v7 for ZOOKEEPER-1560 passes test suite.

Please take a look.

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Thanks Alex for bringing it up. Ill hold the release for now. I see a
> patch on 1560. Ill take a look and we'll see how to roll this into
> 3.4.5.
>
> thanks
> mahadev
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Alexander Shraer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hi Mahadev,
> >
> > ZOOKEEPER-1560 and ZOOKEEPER-1561 indicate a potentially serious issue,
> > introduced recently in ZOOKEEPER-1437. Please consider this w.r.t. the
> > 3.4.5 release.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Alex
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Mahadev Konar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> I think we have waited enough. Closing the vote now.
> >>
> >> With 5 +1's (3 binding) the vote passes. I will do the needful for
> >> getting the release out.
> >>
> >> Thanks for voting folks.
> >>
> >> mahadev
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Flavio Junqueira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> -Flavio
> >>>
> >>> On Oct 8, 2012, at 7:05 AM, Mahadev Konar wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Given Eugene's findings on ZOOKEEPER-1557, I think we can continue
> >>>> rolling the current RC out. Others please vote on the thread if you
> >>>> see any issues with that. Folks who have already voted, please re vote
> >>>> in case you have a change of opinion.
> >>>>
> >>>> As for myself, I ran a couple of tests with the RC using open jdk 7
> >>>> and things seem to work.
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 from my side. Pat/Ben/Flavio/others what do you guys think?
> >>>>
> >>>> thanks
> >>>> mahadev
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>> Currently ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7
> are using
> >>>>> lock ZooKeeper-solaris.
> >>>>> I think ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7
> should use
> >>>>> a separate lock since they wouldn't run on a Solaris machine.
> >>>>> I didn't seem to find how a new lock name can be added.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Recent builds for ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and
> ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7
> >>>>> have been green.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I've seen that before, it's a flakey test that's unrelated to the
> sasl
> >>>>>> stuff.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Patrick
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>>> I saw one test failure:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/9/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum/QuorumPeerMainTest/testHighestZxidJoinLate/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> FYI
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Up in ZOOKEEPER-1557, Eugene separated one test out and test
> failure
> >>>>>> seems
> >>>>>>>> to be gone.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> For ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7, the two failed builds:
> >>>>>>>> #10 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #7,
> >>>>>>>> #8 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #5
> >>>>>>>> where tests failed due to BindException
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Yes. Those ubuntu machines have two slots each. If both tests
> run at
> >>>>>>>>> the same time... bam.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I just added exclusion locks to the configuration of these two
> jobs,
> >>>>>>>>> that should help.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Patrick
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ted Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> I think that was due to the following running on the same
> machine at
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> same time:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Building remotely on ubuntu4
> >>>>>>>>>> <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace
> >>>>>>>>>>
+
Mahadev Konar 2012-10-12, 20:28
+
Alexander Shraer 2012-10-11, 21:47
+
Patrick Hunt 2012-10-05, 17:39
+
Mahadev Konar 2012-11-05, 08:20