I did try to use that method. The Property.LOAD_BALANCER that I used
was not changed when the LoadTableBalancer class retrieved it from the
TableConfigurations. Then I looked at the source code in
TableOperationsImpl. setTableProperty does something through the
Thrift interface. Would that work for unit testing? Either way, I
don't see how the Thift calls eventually set the property into a
I can add some plumbing needed for dependency injection. Doing so
seems fairly harmless.
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:10 PM, John Vines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you looking for connector.TableOperations().setTableProperty?
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:09 PM, David Medinets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>> I am looking for a way to set the table configuration. I see 122
>> references to getTableConfiguration but 0 to setTableConfiguration.
>> There is one usage of "new TableConfiguration" which seems to create
>> an empty configuration. Have I missed something?