Hi,

Per our earlier discussion, http://s.apache.org/0Y I am planning on
spinning up an RC this week. If you want something in the RC, please
ensure it's committed by Thursday 12PM CST.

There are three JIRA's currently marked as Blockers:
http://s.apache.org/Yzx I will look at them individually to verify,
but as the last release went with them open and no progress has been
made since the last release, my belief is that the items would be more
correctly labeled Critical.

Brock

Brock, this sounds great to me.

1. For FLUME-776 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-776> I would
argue it's done. I put the details on the ticket.
2. For FLUME-1051 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1051> I
think it's out of scope for this release
3. For FLUME-1278 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1278> I also
think it's out of scope for this release

Regards,
Mike
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Brock Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Per our earlier discussion, http://s.apache.org/0Y I am planning on
> spinning up an RC this week. If you want something in the RC, please
> ensure it's committed by Thursday 12PM CST.
>
> There are three JIRA's currently marked as Blockers:
> http://s.apache.org/Yzx I will look at them individually to verify,
> but as the last release went with them open and no progress has been
> made since the last release, my belief is that the items would be more
> correctly labeled Critical.
>
> Brock
>

Is an RC likely this week ?
-roshan
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Mike Percy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Brock, this sounds great to me.
>
> 1. For FLUME-776 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-776> I would
> argue it's done. I put the details on the ticket.
> 2. For FLUME-1051 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1051> I
> think it's out of scope for this release
> 3. For FLUME-1278 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1278> I
> also
> think it's out of scope for this release
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Brock Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Per our earlier discussion, http://s.apache.org/0Y I am planning on
> > spinning up an RC this week. If you want something in the RC, please
> > ensure it's committed by Thursday 12PM CST.
> >
> > There are three JIRA's currently marked as Blockers:
> > http://s.apache.org/Yzx I will look at them individually to verify,
> > but as the last release went with them open and no progress has been
> > made since the last release, my belief is that the items would be more
> > correctly labeled Critical.
> >
> > Brock
> >
>

No, there are 6-7 issues waiting for review/updated patches/etc and I
know a fair amount of committers are at Hadoop World.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+FLUME+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%22v1.3.0%22+AND+status+%3D+%22Patch+Available%22+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide

Brock

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Roshan Naik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is an RC likely this week ?
> -roshan
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Mike Percy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Brock, this sounds great to me.
>>
>> 1. For FLUME-776 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-776> I would
>> argue it's done. I put the details on the ticket.
>> 2. For FLUME-1051 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1051> I
>> think it's out of scope for this release
>> 3. For FLUME-1278 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1278> I
>> also
>> think it's out of scope for this release
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Brock Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Per our earlier discussion, http://s.apache.org/0Y I am planning on
>> > spinning up an RC this week. If you want something in the RC, please
>> > ensure it's committed by Thursday 12PM CST.
>> >
>> > There are three JIRA's currently marked as Blockers:
>> > http://s.apache.org/Yzx I will look at them individually to verify,
>> > but as the last release went with them open and no progress has been
>> > made since the last release, my belief is that the items would be more
>> > correctly labeled Critical.
>> >
>> > Brock
>> >
>>

--
Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/

I closed one of those jiras just now. Another one is also ready to go, just waiting on a rebased patch with minor changes.  

Brock - I pushed FLUME-1652 to flume-1.3.0, since you marked FLUME-1664 for Flume-1.3.0. This means that the order on trunk and flume-1.4 is different from flume-1.3.0. You can do a git rebase -i to get the same order back(in git order of commits does not really matter). BUT please note that such a rebase will need any devs using flume-1.3.0 to reset to an older commit and then pull - which is why I didn't do it. As the release manager, I guess you have the choice - though I would not advice it - since commit order is not something of concern as long as the code is the same.
Thanks,
Hari

--
Hari Shreedharan
On Thursday, October 25, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Brock Noland wrote:

> No, there are 6-7 issues waiting for review/updated patches/etc and I
> know a fair amount of committers are at Hadoop World.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+FLUME+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%22v1.3.0%22+AND+status+%3D+%22Patch+Available%22+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide
>
> Brock
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Roshan Naik <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])> wrote:
> > Is an RC likely this week ?
> > -roshan
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Mike Percy <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])> wrote:
> >
> > > Brock, this sounds great to me.
> > >
> > > 1. For FLUME-776 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-776> I would
> > > argue it's done. I put the details on the ticket.
> > > 2. For FLUME-1051 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1051> I
> > > think it's out of scope for this release
> > > 3. For FLUME-1278 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1278> I
> > > also
> > > think it's out of scope for this release
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Mike
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Brock Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Per our earlier discussion, http://s.apache.org/0Y I am planning on
> > > > spinning up an RC this week. If you want something in the RC, please
> > > > ensure it's committed by Thursday 12PM CST.
> > > >
> > > > There are three JIRA's currently marked as Blockers:
> > > > http://s.apache.org/Yzx I will look at them individually to verify,
> > > > but as the last release went with them open and no progress has been
> > > > made since the last release, my belief is that the items would be more
> > > > correctly labeled Critical.
> > > >
> > > > Brock
>
>
>
> --
> Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/
>
>

I've been @ Strata this week and unfortunately found less time than hoped
to get through the reviews and commits I wanted to make. Personally I'd
like another week to get it some of these fixes in.

Regards,
Mike

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Brock Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> No, there are 6-7 issues waiting for review/updated patches/etc and I
> know a fair amount of committers are at Hadoop World.
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+FLUME+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%22v1.3.0%22+AND+status+%3D+%22Patch+Available%22+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide
>
> Brock
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Roshan Naik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Is an RC likely this week ?
> > -roshan
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Mike Percy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Brock, this sounds great to me.
> >>
> >> 1. For FLUME-776 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-776> I
> would
> >> argue it's done. I put the details on the ticket.
> >> 2. For FLUME-1051 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1051> I
> >> think it's out of scope for this release
> >> 3. For FLUME-1278 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1278> I
> >> also
> >> think it's out of scope for this release
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Mike
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Brock Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > Per our earlier discussion, http://s.apache.org/0Y I am planning on
> >> > spinning up an RC this week. If you want something in the RC, please
> >> > ensure it's committed by Thursday 12PM CST.
> >> >
> >> > There are three JIRA's currently marked as Blockers:
> >> > http://s.apache.org/Yzx I will look at them individually to verify,
> >> > but as the last release went with them open and no progress has been
> >> > made since the last release, my belief is that the items would be more
> >> > correctly labeled Critical.
> >> >
> >> > Brock
> >> >
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce -
> http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/
>

Thought of checking back on the availability of the Release Candidate.. any
ETA ?

-roshan

Personally I'd like to get FLUME-1425 in. I'm trying to get it checked in
ASAP. I think we should also pull in FLUME-1629 and FLUME-1660. We're a bit
ahead on patches and behind on reviews at the moment.

Regards
Mike

On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Roshan Naik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Thought of checking back on the availability of the Release Candidate.. any
> ETA ?
>
> -roshan
>

Yes, thats a bigger point. I saw the checkin today, also I agree with FLUME-1629. FLUME-1660 could be moved behind? I'll work through some open reviews today.

+1 for 1.3.0

Thanks,
 Alex

On Nov 6, 2012, at 2:45 AM, Mike Percy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Personally I'd like to get FLUME-1425 in. I'm trying to get it checked in
> ASAP. I think we should also pull in FLUME-1629 and FLUME-1660. We're a bit
> ahead on patches and behind on reviews at the moment.
>
> Regards
> Mike
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Roshan Naik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Thought of checking back on the availability of the Release Candidate.. any
>> ETA ?
>>
>> -roshan
>>

--
Alexander Alten-Lorenz
http://mapredit.blogspot.com
German Hadoop LinkedIn Group: http://goo.gl/N8pCF

There was a request on the JIRA to get
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1277 in as well.

I think we should do that since it's a small patch.

Brock

On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Alexander Lorenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, thats a bigger point. I saw the checkin today, also I agree with FLUME-1629. FLUME-1660 could be moved behind? I'll work through some open reviews today.
>
> +1 for 1.3.0
>
> Thanks,
>  Alex
>
> On Nov 6, 2012, at 2:45 AM, Mike Percy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Personally I'd like to get FLUME-1425 in. I'm trying to get it checked in
>> ASAP. I think we should also pull in FLUME-1629 and FLUME-1660. We're a bit
>> ahead on patches and behind on reviews at the moment.
>>
>> Regards
>> Mike
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Roshan Naik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Thought of checking back on the availability of the Release Candidate.. any
>>> ETA ?
>>>
>>> -roshan
>>>
>
> --
> Alexander Alten-Lorenz
> http://mapredit.blogspot.com
> German Hadoop LinkedIn Group: http://goo.gl/N8pCF
>

--
Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/