Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Drill >> mail # dev >> RC3 Vote: Third time's the charm?


Copy link to this message
-
Re: RC3 Vote: Third time's the charm?
Downloaded and built the latest tarball, mvn tests passed as well.

+1

Tim
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Lisen Mu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Bravo!
>
> by the way, nice logo!
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Ashish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > IMHO, I would prefer to focus on following
> >
> > 1. Fix Header, RAT should run clean
> > 2. Fix License, it's painful, but get it's best to get it right first
> time
> > 3. Source only release, which builds fine and test passes fine
> >
> > This would be good to get the release all the +1's needed.
> >
> > I will hunt down the Licensing related discussion that we had, to see if
> I
> > can help here. Alternatively, reaching out to incubator general always
> help
> > (sebb is very helpful in fixing this aspect ). I shall try to spend time
> on
> > this in next few hours.
> >
> > Hopefully, we shall have a release soon :)
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Regarding libs, I concur.  The source release does not have jars.   I
> > think
> > > I may have confused myself by unpacking both into the same place and
> not
> > > properly cleaning in between.
> > >
> > > Regarding licenses and headers, I don't know the full list.  Clearly we
> > > need license info about netty since we include that code.  Clearly a
> fair
> > > bit of code doesn't have any headers.  Removing the sandbox from the
> > source
> > > release might be a strong step toward fixing that in the actual
> release.
> > >
> > > I suspect that because we keep finding lint that this isn't a complete
> > list
> > > of problems. I think that generating a better list of problems by
> having
> > a
> > > small group meet and walk through the (large and confusing) Apache
> > release
> > > guide would be helpful.
> > >
> > > I have asked Grant and Isabel to take a peek and help us get a more
> > > complete view of what is needed as well.  I may ask somebody else from
> > the
> > > incubator crew to give us a hand, especially if Grant and Isabel are
> tied
> > > up.
> > >
> > > A big part of the problem has to do with the fact that Apache release
> > > processes are a bit variable.  Another part is that the standards are
> > > changing.  Another is that there are *lots* of details to be covered.
> > >
> > > Once this first release is done, a second release should be massively
> > > easier.  Frankly, the difficulty of the first release is precisely the
> > > point of the incubator and the mentor system.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Jacques Nadeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Libs:
> > > > The source release doesn't have any jars in it as far as I can
> tell...
> > > >
> > > > License Headers/Netty:
> > > > Are you saying we need to fix license headers and add a notice for
> > Netty
> > > > then do another rc?  If so, is there anything else we need to do
> > before I
> > > > do the work of another release?
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > > Jacques
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Ted Dunning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Ted Dunning <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Do we have the list of licenses?  Or has someone run RAT?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I just ran RAT.
> > > > >
> > > > > We have lots of files with no license headers.
> > > > >
> > > > > We also have code with Netty headers which isn't mentioned in the
> > > NOTICES
> > > > > or LICENSES file.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > thanks
> > ashish
> >
> > Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
> > My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
> >
>