Hi all,

I've written my first filter iterator, and in trying to use it in the
shell I get a ShellCommandException stating that the command (setiter)
couldn't be initialized because my filter class can't be initialized
as SortedKeyValueIterator.  Digging into Filter though, it extends
WrappingIterator, which implements SortedKeyValueIterator.  Is there
something I'm missing in my implementation (overriding init and
accept)? I don't really know what's going on.

Thanks for the help,
--
Chris

The shell is using a tserver to validate that it can load the iterator.
 Make sure your jar is deployed in lib/ext.  Check the tserver logs for
problems.

-Eric

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Chris Sigman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I've written my first filter iterator, and in trying to use it in the
> shell I get a ShellCommandException stating that the command (setiter)
> couldn't be initialized because my filter class can't be initialized
> as SortedKeyValueIterator.  Digging into Filter though, it extends
> WrappingIterator, which implements SortedKeyValueIterator.  Is there
> something I'm missing in my implementation (overriding init and
> accept)? I don't really know what's going on.
>
> Thanks for the help,
> --
> Chris
>

Ahh, perfect, thanks! I had the jar in the lib directory, not ext.

--
Chris
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Eric Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The shell is using a tserver to validate that it can load the iterator.
> Make sure your jar is deployed in lib/ext.  Check the tserver logs for
> problems.
>
> -Eric
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Chris Sigman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've written my first filter iterator, and in trying to use it in the
>> shell I get a ShellCommandException stating that the command (setiter)
>> couldn't be initialized because my filter class can't be initialized
>> as SortedKeyValueIterator.  Digging into Filter though, it extends
>> WrappingIterator, which implements SortedKeyValueIterator.  Is there
>> something I'm missing in my implementation (overriding init and
>> accept)? I don't really know what's going on.
>>
>> Thanks for the help,
>> --
>> Chris
>
>