Hadoop, mail # general - Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

[VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Arun C Murthy 2012-03-20, 00:13

We've discussed several options:

(1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
(3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
(4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
(5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.

Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.

Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.

thanks,
Arun

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Roman Shaposhnik 2012-03-20, 00:23

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.

Not sure whether this vote is open to all community members, committers or PMC
(Arun, could you, please, clarify?) but here's my vote:

(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
(1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
(5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
(4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e.
2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2.
(3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.

Thanks,
Roman.

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Arun C Murthy 2012-03-20, 00:34

On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We've discussed several options:
>>
>> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
>> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
>> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
>> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>>
>> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>>
>> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> Not sure whether this vote is open to all community members, committers or PMC
> (Arun, could you, please, clarify?) but here's my vote:

As always, everyone is welcome to vote. PMC votes are binding.

Forgot to add, the vote will run the normal 7 days.

Thanks for voting Roman.

Arun

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Shaneal Manek 2012-03-20, 00:41

2
1
3
4
5

My vote is non-binding, fwiw.

-Shaneal

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> We've discussed several options:
>>>
>>> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
>>> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
>>> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
>>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
>>> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>>>
>>> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>>>
>>> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>>
>> Not sure whether this vote is open to all community members, committers or PMC
>> (Arun, could you, please, clarify?) but here's my vote:
>
> As always, everyone is welcome to vote. PMC votes are binding.
>
> Forgot to add, the vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> Thanks for voting Roman.
>
> Arun

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Brock Noland 2012-03-20, 00:44

2
1
3
4
5

(non-binding)

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Shaneal Manek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2
> 1
> 3
> 4
> 5
>
> My vote is non-binding, fwiw.
>
> -Shaneal
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> We've discussed several options:
>>>>
>>>> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
>>>> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
>>>> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
>>>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
>>>> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>>>>
>>>> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>>>>
>>>> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>>>
>>> Not sure whether this vote is open to all community members, committers or PMC
>>> (Arun, could you, please, clarify?) but here's my vote:
>>
>> As always, everyone is welcome to vote. PMC votes are binding.
>>
>> Forgot to add, the vote will run the normal 7 days.
>>
>> Thanks for voting Roman.
>>
>> Arun

--
Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Todd Lipcon 2012-03-20, 00:50

My vote: 3,2,1,4,5, in order of preference. (binding)

-Todd

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Brock Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2
> 1
> 3
> 4
> 5
>
> (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Shaneal Manek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2
>> 1
>> 3
>> 4
>> 5
>>
>> My vote is non-binding, fwiw.
>>
>> -Shaneal
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> We've discussed several options:
>>>>>
>>>>> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
>>>>> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
>>>>> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
>>>>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
>>>>> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>>>>
>>>> Not sure whether this vote is open to all community members, committers or PMC
>>>> (Arun, could you, please, clarify?) but here's my vote:
>>>
>>> As always, everyone is welcome to vote. PMC votes are binding.
>>>
>>> Forgot to add, the vote will run the normal 7 days.
>>>
>>> Thanks for voting Roman.
>>>
>>> Arun
>
>
>
> --
> Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/

--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Eli Collins 2012-03-20, 00:55

3, 2, 4, 1, 5 In order of preference (binding)

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Todd Lipcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My vote: 3,2,1,4,5, in order of preference. (binding)
>
> -Todd
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Brock Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2
>> 1
>> 3
>> 4
>> 5
>>
>> (non-binding)
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Shaneal Manek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 2
>>> 1
>>> 3
>>> 4
>>> 5
>>>
>>> My vote is non-binding, fwiw.
>>>
>>> -Shaneal
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>> We've discussed several options:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
>>>>>> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
>>>>>> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
>>>>>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
>>>>>> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not sure whether this vote is open to all community members, committers or PMC
>>>>> (Arun, could you, please, clarify?) but here's my vote:
>>>>
>>>> As always, everyone is welcome to vote. PMC votes are binding.
>>>>
>>>> Forgot to add, the vote will run the normal 7 days.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for voting Roman.
>>>>
>>>> Arun
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/
>
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Arun C Murthy 2012-03-20, 01:03

My sincere apologies. I messed up on option (4) - it should read:

> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.

instead of

> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
Let me restart the vote.

Arun

On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:

> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>

--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/

[VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Arun C Murthy 2012-03-20, 01:06

We've discussed several options:

(1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
(3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
(4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
(5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.

Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.

Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.

My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).

The vote will run the normal 7 days.

thanks,
Arun

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Todd Lipcon 2012-03-20, 01:11

My vote remains the same: (binding)
(3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
(1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
(4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e.
2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively
postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
(5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>

--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Kihwal Lee 2012-03-20, 01:22

3-2-1-4-5 non-binding

-kihwal

On Mar 19, 2012, at 7:57 PM, "Eli Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 3, 2, 4, 1, 5 In order of preference (binding)
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Todd Lipcon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> My vote: 3,2,1,4,5, in order of preference. (binding)
>>
>> -Todd
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Brock Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 2
>>> 1
>>> 3
>>> 4
>>> 5
>>>
>>> (non-binding)
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Shaneal Manek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> 2
>>>> 1
>>>> 3
>>>> 4
>>>> 5
>>>>
>>>> My vote is non-binding, fwiw.
>>>>
>>>> -Shaneal
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>> We've discussed several options:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
>>>>>>> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
>>>>>>> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
>>>>>>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
>>>>>>> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not sure whether this vote is open to all community members, committers or PMC
>>>>>> (Arun, could you, please, clarify?) but here's my vote:
>>>>>
>>>>> As always, everyone is welcome to vote. PMC votes are binding.
>>>>>
>>>>> Forgot to add, the vote will run the normal 7 days.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for voting Roman.
>>>>>
>>>>> Arun
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Apache MRUnit - Unit testing MapReduce - http://incubator.apache.org/mrunit/
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Todd Lipcon
>> Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Luke Lu 2012-03-20, 01:35

Preference in descending order: 4, 3, 2, 1, 5

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Suresh Srinivas 2012-03-20, 01:58

3, 4, 2

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a
> hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2
> months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone
> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Tsz Wo Sze 2012-03-20, 02:25

My vote is 3, 4, 2.

> Let's do a STV [1] ...

Since STV for single-winner elections is equivalent to instant-runoff voting. You may want to read [2] instead of [1]. In particular, the flowchart [3] in [2] is very easy to understand.
Regards,

Tsz-Wo
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IRV_counting_flowchart.1.png
________________________________
From: Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 6:06 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

We've discussed several options:

(1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
(3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
(4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
(5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.

Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.

Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.

My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).

The vote will run the normal 7 days.

thanks,
Arun

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Shaneal Manek 2012-03-20, 02:38

A little random but, for future consideration, approval voting
generally leads to saner results than IRV.

It's very counter-intuitive to me, but I've been told by people
smarter than myself that it's a pretty well accepted result. It's not
perfect, but nothing is as proved by Arrow's Impossibility Theorem
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow%27s_impossibility_theorem)

Some references:
http://scorevoting.net/CompleteIdioticIRV.html
http://www.electology.org/approval-voting-vs-irv

-Shaneal

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Tsz Wo Sze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My vote is 3, 4, 2.
>
>> Let's do a STV [1] ...
>
> Since STV for single-winner elections is equivalent to instant-runoff voting. You may want to read [2] instead of [1]. In particular, the flowchart [3] in [2] is very easy to understand.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Tsz-Wo
>
>
> [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting
>
>
> [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IRV_counting_flowchart.1.png
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 6:06 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
>
> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

sanjay Radia 2012-03-20, 04:15

My binding vote:

(4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
(3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:

> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Eli Collins 2012-03-20, 04:45

My vote: 3, 2, 4, 1, 5 In order of preference (binding)

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:15 PM, sanjay Radia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My binding vote:
>
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>
>> We've discussed several options:
>>
>> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
>> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
>> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
>> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>>
>> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>>
>> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>>
>> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>>
>> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Arun
>>
>> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Mahadev Konar 2012-03-20, 04:49

My vote: 3, 2, 4, 1, 5 (binding).

Thanks
Mahadev Konar
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Tsz Wo Sze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> My vote is 3, 4, 2.
>
> > Let's do a STV [1] ...
>
> Since STV for single-winner elections is equivalent to instant-runoff
> voting. You may want to read [2] instead of [1]. In particular, the
> flowchart [3] in [2] is very easy to understand.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Tsz-Wo
>
>
> [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting
>
>
> [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IRV_counting_flowchart.1.png
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 6:06 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
>
> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a
> hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2
> months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone
> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Jun Ping Du 2012-03-20, 05:04

3, 1, 5, 4, 2 no binding.
I don't like a "hole" there as it means a lack of foresight sometimes.

Thanks,

Junping

----- Original Message -----
From: "Arun C Murthy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 9:06:41 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

We've discussed several options:

(1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
(3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
(4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
(5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.

Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.

Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.

My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).

The vote will run the normal 7 days.

thanks,
Arun

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Eric Baldeschwieler 2012-03-20, 05:15

3,4,2,1 non-binding

On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:03 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:

> My sincere apologies. I messed up on option (4) - it should read:
>
>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
>
> instead of
>
>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
>
>
> Let me restart the vote.
>
> Arun
>
> On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>
>> We've discussed several options:
>>
>> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
>> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
>> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
>> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>>
>> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>>
>> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Arun
>>
>> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>>
>
> --
> Arun C. Murthy
> Hortonworks Inc.
> http://hortonworks.com/
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Todd Papaioannou 2012-03-20, 06:02

3,4,2,1 - non binding

Thanks,

Todd

On Mar 20, 2012, at 1:15 AM, Eric Baldeschwieler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 3,4,2,1 non-binding
>
> On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:03 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>
>> My sincere apologies. I messed up on option (4) - it should read:
>>
>>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
>>
>> instead of
>>
>>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
>>
>>
>> Let me restart the vote.
>>
>> Arun
>>
>> On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>>
>>> We've discussed several options:
>>>
>>> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
>>> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
>>> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
>>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
>>> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>>>
>>> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>>>
>>> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> Arun
>>>
>>> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Arun C. Murthy
>> Hortonworks Inc.
>> http://hortonworks.com/
>>
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Konstantin Shvachko 2012-03-20, 06:34

Arun,
how do you plan to count the vote on this?
Could you please publish the formula.
Thanks,
--Konst

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Jitendra Pandey 2012-03-20, 06:58

My vote: 3 4 1 (binding).

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a
> hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2
> months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone
> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>
>
--

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Arun C Murthy 2012-03-20, 11:10

Konst,

Please links Nic sent out - essentially STV with a single winner becomes IRV: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting

A helpful flowchart: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:IRV_counting_flowchart.1.png

Btw, thanks for the links Nic!

Arun

On Mar 19, 2012, at 11:34 PM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:

> Arun,
> how do you plan to count the vote on this?
> Could you please publish the formula.
> Thanks,
> --Konst
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We've discussed several options:
>>
>> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
>> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
>> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
>> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>>
>> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>>
>> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>>
>> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>>
>> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Arun
>>
>> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>>

--
Arun C. Murthy
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Mark Holderbaugh 2012-03-20, 12:55

3, 2, 1, 4, 5 (non-binding)
Mark

On 3/19/12 8:06 PM, "Arun C Murthy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>We've discussed several options:
>
>(1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
>(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a
>hole.
>(3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
>(4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2
>months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone
>discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
>(5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
>Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
>Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
>My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
>The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
>thanks,
>Arun
>
>[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

John George 2012-03-20, 14:14

3, 2, 1, 4, 5 (non-binding)

John George
-----Original Message-----
From: Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 20:06:41 -0500
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

>We've discussed several options:
>
>(1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
>(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a
>hole.
>(3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
>(4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2
>months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone
>discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
>(5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
>Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
>Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
>My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
>The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
>thanks,
>Arun
>
>[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Adam Faris 2012-03-20, 15:07

3, 4, 5, 2, 1 (non-binding)

On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:

> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Thomas Graves 2012-03-20, 15:46

3, 2, 1, 4, 5 (non-binding)
Tom
On 3/19/12 8:06 PM, "Arun C Murthy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2
> months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone
> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Robert Evans 2012-03-20, 16:05

3,4,2,1,5

--Bobby Evans
On 3/19/12 8:06 PM, "Arun C Murthy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

We've discussed several options:

(1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
(3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
(4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
(5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.

Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.

Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.

My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).

The vote will run the normal 7 days.

thanks,
Arun

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Hitesh Shah 2012-03-20, 16:19

3, 4, 2, 1

-- Hitesh

On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:

> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Nathan Roberts 2012-03-20, 16:35

3,2,1,4,5 (non-binding)

Nathan
On 3/19/12 8:06 PM, "Arun C Murthy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

We've discussed several options:

(1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
(3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
(4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
(5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.

Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.

Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.

My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).

The vote will run the normal 7 days.

thanks,
Arun

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Jason Lowe 2012-03-20, 16:37

3, 2, 1, 4, 5 (non-binding)

Jason

On 03/19/2012 08:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Daryn Sharp 2012-03-20, 17:14

3 1 4 2 5 (non-binding)

Daryn
On Mar 19, 2012, at 8:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:

> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Enis Söztutar 2012-03-20, 18:15

My vote is:

3 2 1 5 4. (binding)

Thanks,
Enis

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Daryn Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 3 1 4 2 5 (non-binding)
>
> Daryn
>
>
> On Mar 19, 2012, at 8:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>
> > We've discussed several options:
> >
> > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a
> hole.
> > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2
> months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone
> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
> >
> > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
> >
> > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
> >
> > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
> >
> > The vote will run the normal 7 days.
> >
> > thanks,
> > Arun
> >
> > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
> >
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

James Warren 2012-03-20, 18:24

My vote is:

3 4 2 1 5 (non-binding)

Regards,
-James

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a
> hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2
> months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone
> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Ahmed Radwan 2012-03-20, 18:33

My vote: 3,2,1,4,5 (non-binding).

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>

--
Ahmed

RE: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Amol Kekre 2012-03-20, 18:56

My non-binding vote is 3, 2, 1, 5

Amol.

-----Original Message-----
From: Arun C Murthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 6:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

We've discussed several options:

(1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
(3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
(4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
(5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.

Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.

Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.

My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).

The vote will run the normal 7 days.

thanks,
Arun

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Giridharan Kesavan 2012-03-20, 20:25

My vote : 3 4 1
-Giri

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Patrick Hunt 2012-03-20, 21:33

4,2,3

Patrick

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Jonathan Eagles 2012-03-20, 21:51

3, 2, 1, 4, 5 (non-binding)

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a
> hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2
> months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone
> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Doug Cutting 2012-03-20, 21:53

1, 2, 3, 4, 5.

Doug

On 03/19/2012 06:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Devaraj Das 2012-03-20, 22:07

My binding vote is:
4, 3, 2, 1, 5

On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:

> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Bruno Mahé 2012-03-20, 22:12

My vote is:
(1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a
hole.
(4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2
months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone
discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
(3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
(5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.

On 03/19/2012 06:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Milind.Bhandarkar@... 2012-03-20, 22:15

My (non-binding) vote is: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

- milind

>On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>
>> We've discussed several options:
>>
>> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
>> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a
>>hole.
>> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e.
>>2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively
>>postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
>> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>>
>> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>>
>> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>>
>> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>>
>> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Arun
>>
>> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Dhruba Borthakur 2012-03-20, 23:03

My vote is (3).

-dhruba

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:15 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> My (non-binding) vote is: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
>
> - milind
>
> >On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> >
> >> We've discussed several options:
> >>
> >> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> >> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a
> >>hole.
> >> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> >> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e.
> >>2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively
> >>postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> >> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
> >>
> >> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
> >>
> >> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
> >>
> >> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
> >>
> >> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >> Arun
> >>
> >> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
--
Subscribe to my posts at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Joep Rottinghuis 2012-03-21, 04:01

1,2,3,4,5 (non binding)

Promoting 21 and 23 as major releases is great, but what's the point of leaving no space for 22 as a possible major release?

Joep

On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Amareshwari Sri Ramadasu 2012-03-21, 04:29

My vote 2 3 1 4 5

Thanks
Amareshwari

On 3/20/12 6:36 AM, "Arun C Murthy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

We've discussed several options:

(1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
(3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
(4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
(5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.

Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.

Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.

My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).

The vote will run the normal 7 days.

thanks,
Arun

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Sharad Agarwal 2012-03-21, 04:43

my binding vote:
3 1 2 4 5

sharad

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a
> hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2
> months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone
> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Kihwal Lee 2012-03-21, 13:58

Recasting to the revised one.
3, 2, 1, 4, 5 (non-binding)

Kihwal

On 3/19/12 8:06 PM, "Arun C Murthy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

We've discussed several options:

(1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
(3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
(4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
(5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.

Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.

Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.

My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).

The vote will run the normal 7 days.

thanks,
Arun

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote

RE: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Uma Maheswara Rao G 2012-03-21, 15:04

My vote:
3, 1, 2

Regards,
Uma

________________________________________
From: Arun C Murthy [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 6:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

We've discussed several options:

(1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
(3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
(4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
(5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.

Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.

Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.

My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).

The vote will run the normal 7 days.

thanks,
Arun

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Alejandro Abdelnur 2012-03-21, 17:01

My vote is 3, 2

Thanks.

Alejandro

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Uma Maheswara Rao G
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> My vote:
> 3, 1, 2
>
> Regards,
> Uma
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Arun C Murthy [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 6:36 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x
>
> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a
> hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2
> months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone
> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli 2012-03-21, 17:09

My preference: 3, 4, 2, 1. (binding)

Thanks
+Vinod
On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:

> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Arpit Gupta 2012-03-21, 18:46

3, 4, 2, 1, 5 (non binding)

--
Arpit Gupta
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/

On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:

> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Konstantin Shvachko 2012-03-22, 08:56

1, 2, 5

Thanks,
--Konst

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>

Re:[VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

guoshunxu 2012-03-22, 14:25

(5)

At 2012-03-20 08:13:01,"Arun C Murthy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>We've discussed several options:
>
>(1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
>(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
>(3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
>(4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
>(5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
>Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
>Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
>thanks,
>Arun
>
>[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

M. C. Srivas 2012-03-22, 14:27

1, 2, 3, 4, 5
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > We've discussed several options:
> >
> > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a
> hole.
> > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2
> months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone
> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
> >
> > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
> >
> > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
> >
> > My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
> >
> > The vote will run the normal 7 days.
> >
> > thanks,
> > Arun
> >
> > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Benoy Antony 2012-03-22, 17:31

1,4, 2,3,5 (non-binding)

Thanks,
Benoy Antony

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a
> hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2
> months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone
> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Konstantin Boudnik 2012-03-22, 19:49

1, 2, 5

Items 3, 4 are unreasonable, IMO, and not beneficial to the community at
large.

Cos

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 06:03PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> My sincere apologies. I messed up on option (4) - it should read:
>
> > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
>
> instead of
>
> > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
>
>
> Let me restart the vote.
>
> Arun
>
> On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>
> > We've discussed several options:
> >
> > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
> >
> > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
> >
> > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
> >
> > thanks,
> > Arun
> >
> > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
> >
>
> --
> Arun C. Murthy
> Hortonworks Inc.
> http://hortonworks.com/
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Ted Yu 2012-03-22, 19:51

1, 2, 5 (non-binding)

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a
> hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2
> months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone
> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>
>

RE: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Jagane Sundar 2012-03-22, 20:34

1,2,4,3,5

Jagane

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 06:03PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> My sincere apologies. I messed up on option (4) - it should read:
>
> > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
>
> instead of
>
> > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
>
>
> Let me restart the vote.
>
> Arun
>
> On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
>
> > We've discussed several options:
> >
> > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
> >
> > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
> >
> > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
> >
> > thanks,
> > Arun
> >
> > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
> >
>
> --
> Arun C. Murthy
> Hortonworks Inc.
> http://hortonworks.com/
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Aaron T. Myers 2012-03-22, 22:46

My vote: 3, 2, 1, 4, 5 (binding)

--
Aaron T. Myers
Software Engineer, Cloudera

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a
> hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2
> months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone
> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>
> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Fomenko Anatoli 2012-03-23, 00:33

My votes:
1, 2, 5

where
(1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3
(2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
(5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
Anatoli

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Haruyasu Ueda 2012-03-23, 01:02

3,5 (non-binding)

Making three official version announces to community that these versions
are maintained in high priority. It leades to human resource is
distributed, which makes the evlution of Hadoop slower.

For a while, branch-0.23 might be unstaible. But, in longer timescale,
the fewer commitment line, the more human resource is concentrated on
major release and sooner or lator all the patches for branch-0.22 would
be merged into branch-0.23(major release), I hope.

Regards,
--HAL

On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:49:58 -0700
Konstantin Boudnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 1, 2, 5
>
> Items 3, 4 are unreasonable, IMO, and not beneficial to the community at
> large.
>
> Cos
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 06:03PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> > My sincere apologies. I messed up on option (4) - it should read:
> >
> > > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> >
> > instead of
> >
> > > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> >
> >
> > Let me restart the vote.
> >
> > Arun
> >
> > On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> >
> > > We've discussed several options:
> > >
> > > (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> > > (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> > > (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> > > (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> > > (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
> > >
> > > Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
> > >
> > > Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > Arun
> > >
> > > [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Arun C. Murthy
> > Hortonworks Inc.
> > http://hortonworks.com/
> >
> >

=======================================================================Haruyasu Ueda, Research Manager
Research Center for Cloud Computing
FUJITSU LABORATORIES LTD.
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: +81 44 754 2575
Ken-S602, 4-1-1, Kamikodanaka, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, 211-8588 Japan
=======================================================================

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Tom White 2012-03-23, 04:33

3, 2, 1, 4, 5

Tom

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Arun C Murthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've discussed several options:
>
> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 2. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>
> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>
> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Marcos Ortiz 2012-03-23, 15:28

1,2, 5
Best wishes

On 03/22/2012 03:56 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We've discussed several options:
>>
>> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
>> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a hole.
>> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2 months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
>> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>>
>> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>>
>> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>>
>> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>>
>> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Arun
>>
>> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>>

--
Marcos Luis Ortï¿½z Valmaseda (@marcosluis2186)
Data Engineer at UCI
http://marcosluis2186.posterous.com

10mo. ANIVERSARIO DE LA CREACION DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE LAS CIENCIAS INFORMATICAS...
CONECTADOS AL FUTURO, CONECTADOS A LA REVOLUCION

http://www.uci.cu
http://www.facebook.com/universidad.uci
http://www.flickr.com/photos/universidad_uci

Re: [VOTE] Rename hadoop branches post hadoop-1.x

Eric Yang 2012-03-27, 04:33

3, 4, 2 (binding)

regards,
Eric

On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Marcos Ortiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1,2, 5
> Best wishes
>
>
> On 03/22/2012 03:56 AM, Konstantin Shvachko wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Arun C Murthy<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> We've discussed several options:
>>>
>>> (1) Rename branch-0.22 to branch-2, rename branch-0.23 to branch-3.
>>> (2) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-3, keep branch-0.22 as-is i.e. leave a
>>> hole.
>>> (3) Rename branch-0.23 to branch-2, keep branch-0.22 as-is.
>>> (4) If security is fixed in branch-0.22 within a short time-frame i.e. 2
>>> months then we get option 1, else we get option 3. Effectively postpone
>>> discussion by 2 months, start a timer now.
>>> (5) Do nothing, keep branch-0.22 and branch-0.23 as-is.
>>>
>>> Let's do a STV [1] to get reach consensus.
>>>
>>> Please vote by listing the options above in order of your preferences.
>>>
>>> My vote is 3, 4, 2, 1, 5 in order (binding).
>>>
>>> The vote will run the normal 7 days.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> Arun
>>>
>>> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote
>>>
>
> --
> Marcos Luis Ortíz Valmaseda (@marcosluis2186)
> Data Engineer at UCI
> http://marcosluis2186.posterous.com
>
>
>
> 10mo. ANIVERSARIO DE LA CREACION DE LA UNIVERSIDAD DE LAS CIENCIAS
> INFORMATICAS...
> CONECTADOS AL FUTURO, CONECTADOS A LA REVOLUCION
>
> http://www.uci.cu
> http://www.facebook.com/universidad.uci
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/universidad_uci