Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # user >> HTable writeAsyncBuffer


Copy link to this message
-
Re: HTable writeAsyncBuffer
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Koert Kuipers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> hey st.ack
>
> well i am considering creating lots of deletes from a map-reduce job
> instead of puts, and was looking at the code to see how efficient that
> would be...
>
>

You  have been writing code for a while (smile)?

> but now i am more generally wondering if there is any downside to making
> all these operations go into the buffer instead of treating puts special.
>
>
I'm not sure I understand the question.  If you are asking if doing mass
individual deletes of cells is to be avoided, the answer is yes.  But maybe
I have you wrong?

St.Ack
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB