Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # user >> region size


I think the answer to this is "no", but I am hoping someone with more experience can confirm this… we are on hbase 0.90.4 (from cdh3u2). Some of our storefiles have grown into the 3-4GB range (we have 100GB max region size). Ignoring compactions, do large storefiles like this have a negative impact on random reads? We only recently started doing a large number of random gets so I have no history to go on in terms of correlating storefile size with lackluster performance for random reads.

Thanks,
Paul
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB