We've been tinkering around ideas of implementing secondary index.
One of the ideas is based on concatenating three meaningful fields into a long: int, short (2 bytes), short. This long will be used as timestamp when issuing a put to the secondary index table.
This means an puts, timestamp wise, will not occur chronologically. since this is not a real timestamp.
Will this create any issues?
Sonal Goyal 2012-07-09, 15:54
Asaf Mesika 2012-07-09, 17:08
Mohammad Tariq 2012-07-09, 22:08
Asaf Mesika 2012-07-10, 03:31
Mohammad Tariq 2012-07-10, 08:02