Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
Avro >> mail # user >> Avro enhancement: asynchronous RPCs for Java clients

Copy link to this message
Re: Avro enhancement: asynchronous RPCs for Java clients
Thanks, Scott!  Patch posted to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-539, and it's up on ReviewBoard
here: https://reviews.apache.org/r/834/

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Scott Carey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Sounds great!
> Put a patch into:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-539
> (We may rename that and modify the description to better describe your
> change; but it clearly fulfills the intention of the original JIRA)
> If you'd like you can also put it in ReviewBoard, with a link to that
> inside the ticket.  But until there is a patch uploaded in JIRA granting
> license to Apache it can't be considered for committing.
> We can discuss remaining details in the ticket.
> Thanks!
> On 6/1/11 10:22 PM, "James Baldassari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just finished a second attempt at the asynchronous RPC implementation
> incorporating Philip's feedback and some other ideas that I had.  I think
> it's easiest to explain how it works with an example.  So here's a simple
> IDL and schema:
> IDL:
> protocol Calculator {
>   int add(int arg1, int arg2);
> }
> Schema:
> {"protocol":"Calculator","messages":{
>   "add":{
>     "request":[{"name":"arg1","type":"int"},{"name":"arg2","type":"int"}],
>     "response":"int"}}}
> No changes are required to the IDL or schema to enable async RPCs.  The
> Avro Java compiler will generate two interfaces instead of one.  The first
> interface, Calculator, contains the standard synchronous methods.  The
> second interface, CalculatorClient, extends Calculator and adds asynchronous
> methods for all two-way messages.  The reason why the async methods are
> separated out into a separate interface is that the responder/server side
> doesn't need to know (and shouldn't know) about the client-side async
> methods.  So the Responder/server implements Calculator, and the
> Requestor/client can either use Calculator or CalculatorClient to invoke the
> RPCs.  For reference, here is what the two generated interfaces look like
> (without the PROTOCOL field and package names):
> public interface Calculator {
>   int add(int arg1, int arg2) throws AvroRemoteException;
> }
> public interface CalculatorClient extends Calculator {
>   CallFuture<Integer> addAsync(int arg1, int arg2) throws IOException;
>   CallFuture<Integer> addAsync(int arg1, int arg2, Callback<Integer>
> callback) throws IOException;
> }
> The CalculatorClient interface is the only new component.  It has two
> methods for each message, one that takes a Callback and one that does not.
> Both methods return a CallFuture so that the client has the option of using
> either the Future or the Callback to obtain the result of the RPC.
> Future.get() blocks until the RPC is complete, and either returns the result
> or throws an exception if one occurred during the RPC.  The Callback
> interface has two methods, handleResult(T result) and handleError(Exception
> error).  One or the other is always called depending on whether the RPC was
> successful or an Exception was thrown.
> In addition to the compiler changes, I had to make some changes in the
> avro-ipc project to get the async plumbing to work correctly.  Most of these
> changes are in Requestor and NettyTransceiver.  As part of the changes I had
> to make to Requestor I ended up replacing a couple of large synchronized
> blocks with finer-grained critical sections protected by reentrant locks.  I
> think this change improved performance overall, at least in the case where
> multiple threads are using the same client.  I implemented a rudimentary
> performance test that spins up a bunch of threads, executes the same RPC
> (Simple.hello(String)) repeatedly for a fixed amount of time, and then
> calculates the average number of RPCs completed per second.  With Avro 1.5.1
> I got 7,450 RPCs/sec, and with my modified version of trunk I got 19,050
> RPCs/sec.  That was a very simple test, but if there is a standard benchmark
> that the Avro team uses I'd be happy to rerun my tests using that.