I have created a new candidate build for Avro release 1.6.2.

Changes are listed at:

  http://s.apache.org/4u3

Please download, test, and vote.

  http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro-1.6.2-rc1/

The Maven staging repository is at:

  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheavro-214/

Thanks in advance for voting!

Doug

+1

Downloaded source tarball.  Checksums and signature are correct.  All
tests passed.  Rat finds no license issues.

Doug

On 02/09/2012 04:06 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> I have created a new candidate build for Avro release 1.6.2.
>
> Changes are listed at:
>
>   http://s.apache.org/4u3
>
> Please download, test, and vote.
>
>   http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro-1.6.2-rc1/
>
> The Maven staging repository is at:
>
>   https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheavro-214/
>
> Thanks in advance for voting!
>
> Doug

<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1027>AVRO-1027 just came in a
few hours ago with a patch.  I reviewed and tested it, and it looks good.
Any chance we could roll a new 1.6.2 rc with this patch?

-James
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> +1
>
> Downloaded source tarball.  Checksums and signature are correct.  All
> tests passed.  Rat finds no license issues.
>
> Doug
>
> On 02/09/2012 04:06 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> > I have created a new candidate build for Avro release 1.6.2.
> >
> > Changes are listed at:
> >
> >   http://s.apache.org/4u3
> >
> > Please download, test, and vote.
> >
> >   http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro-1.6.2-rc1/
> >
> > The Maven staging repository is at:
> >
> >   https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheavro-214/
> >
> > Thanks in advance for voting!
> >
> > Doug
>

On 02/10/2012 11:50 PM, James Baldassari wrote:
>  <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1027>AVRO-1027 just came in a
> few hours ago with a patch.  I reviewed and tested it, and it looks good.
> Any chance we could roll a new 1.6.2 rc with this patch?

If we get two more +1 votes from the PMC today then we can release 1.6.2
today.  I'd rather not restart that vote now.  If we restart votes every
time a bug is identified then it's hard to get releases out.

We can always roll a 1.6.3 candidate later this week and start that vote
once AVRO-1027 is committed.  There are a few other issues which are
nearly ready to commit that might make it too.

So, in summary, I'm happy to roll another relase candidate and call
another vote this week.  If the 1.6.2 vote never passes then we'll call
this week's release 1.6.2, otherwise it'd be called 1.6.3.  It's better
to have more releases than fewer.

Doug

Sounds good, Doug.  Thanks.

-James
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 02/10/2012 11:50 PM, James Baldassari wrote:
> >  <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AVRO-1027>AVRO-1027 just came
> in a
> > few hours ago with a patch.  I reviewed and tested it, and it looks good.
> > Any chance we could roll a new 1.6.2 rc with this patch?
>
> If we get two more +1 votes from the PMC today then we can release 1.6.2
> today.  I'd rather not restart that vote now.  If we restart votes every
> time a bug is identified then it's hard to get releases out.
>
> We can always roll a 1.6.3 candidate later this week and start that vote
> once AVRO-1027 is committed.  There are a few other issues which are
> nearly ready to commit that might make it too.
>
> So, in summary, I'm happy to roll another relase candidate and call
> another vote this week.  If the 1.6.2 vote never passes then we'll call
> this week's release 1.6.2, otherwise it'd be called 1.6.3.  It's better
> to have more releases than fewer.
>
> Doug
>

+1

Checksums match.  Src tarball builds and tests pass.

Integrated my applications with the test maven repo, they compile and pass
tests with the new version.

On 2/9/12 4:06 PM, "Doug Cutting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>I have created a new candidate build for Avro release 1.6.2.
>
>Changes are listed at:
>
>  http://s.apache.org/4u3
>
>Please download, test, and vote.
>
>  http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro-1.6.2-rc1/
>
>The Maven staging repository is at:
>
>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheavro-214/
>
>Thanks in advance for voting!
>
>Doug

-0 for now

I had trouble with the C unit tests (I ran "./build.sh test" on ubuntu
oneiric).  Are other folks having trouble?  The java unit tests work.

Running tests...
Test project /home/philip/Downloads/avro-src-1.6.2/build/c
    Start 1: quickstop
1/9 Test #1: quickstop ........................   Passed    0.16 sec
    Start 2: test_data_structures
2/9 Test #2: test_data_structures .............   Passed    0.01 sec
    Start 3: test_avro_schema
3/9 Test #3: test_avro_schema .................   Passed    0.01 sec
    Start 4: test_avro_schema_names
4/9 Test #4: test_avro_schema_names ...........   Passed    0.01 sec
    Start 5: test_avro_values
5/9 Test #5: test_avro_values .................***Failed    0.01 sec
    Start 6: test_avro_968
6/9 Test #6: test_avro_968 ....................   Passed    0.01 sec
    Start 7: test_avro_984
7/9 Test #7: test_avro_984 ....................   Passed    0.01 sec
    Start 8: test_avro_data
8/9 Test #8: test_avro_data ...................   Passed    0.06 sec
    Start 9: test_cpp
9/9 Test #9: test_cpp .........................   Passed    0.01 sec

89% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 9

Total Test time (real) =   0.64 sec

The following tests FAILED:
  5 - test_avro_values (Failed)
Errors while running CTest

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Scott Carey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> +1
>
> Checksums match.  Src tarball builds and tests pass.
>
> Integrated my applications with the test maven repo, they compile and pass
> tests with the new version.
>
> On 2/9/12 4:06 PM, "Doug Cutting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I have created a new candidate build for Avro release 1.6.2.
> >
> >Changes are listed at:
> >
> >  http://s.apache.org/4u3
> >
> >Please download, test, and vote.
> >
> >  http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro-1.6.2-rc1/
> >
> >The Maven staging repository is at:
> >
> >  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheavro-214/
> >
> >Thanks in advance for voting!
> >
> >Doug
>
>

On 02/14/2012 01:35 PM, Philip Zeyliger wrote:
> I had trouble with the C unit tests (I ran "./build.sh test" on ubuntu
> oneiric).

Is this a regression?  Do 1.6.1 tests pass on your machine?

http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/avro/avro-1.6.1/

Thanks!

Doug

FWIW, this is my output of C tests, from Mac OSX 10.6.8  (Snow Leopard).

[100%] Built target index_html
Running tests...
Test project /Users/scottc/avro/1.6.2-rc1/avro-src-1.6.2/build/c
    Start 1: quickstop
1/9 Test #1: quickstop ........................   Passed    0.38 sec
    Start 2: test_data_structures
2/9 Test #2: test_data_structures .............   Passed    0.01 sec
    Start 3: test_avro_schema
3/9 Test #3: test_avro_schema .................   Passed    0.05 sec
    Start 4: test_avro_schema_names
4/9 Test #4: test_avro_schema_names ...........   Passed    0.01 sec
    Start 5: test_avro_values
5/9 Test #5: test_avro_values .................   Passed    0.59 sec
    Start 6: test_avro_968
6/9 Test #6: test_avro_968 ....................   Passed    0.02 sec
    Start 7: test_avro_984
7/9 Test #7: test_avro_984 ....................   Passed    0.02 sec
    Start 8: test_avro_data
8/9 Test #8: test_avro_data ...................   Passed    0.20 sec
    Start 9: test_cpp
9/9 Test #9: test_cpp .........................   Passed    0.02 sec

100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 9

On 2/14/12 1:35 PM, "Philip Zeyliger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>-0 for now
>
>I had trouble with the C unit tests (I ran "./build.sh test" on ubuntu
>oneiric).  Are other folks having trouble?  The java unit tests work.
>
>Running tests...
>Test project /home/philip/Downloads/avro-src-1.6.2/build/c
>    Start 1: quickstop
>1/9 Test #1: quickstop ........................   Passed    0.16 sec
>    Start 2: test_data_structures
>2/9 Test #2: test_data_structures .............   Passed    0.01 sec
>    Start 3: test_avro_schema
>3/9 Test #3: test_avro_schema .................   Passed    0.01 sec
>    Start 4: test_avro_schema_names
>4/9 Test #4: test_avro_schema_names ...........   Passed    0.01 sec
>    Start 5: test_avro_values
>5/9 Test #5: test_avro_values .................***Failed    0.01 sec
>    Start 6: test_avro_968
>6/9 Test #6: test_avro_968 ....................   Passed    0.01 sec
>    Start 7: test_avro_984
>7/9 Test #7: test_avro_984 ....................   Passed    0.01 sec
>    Start 8: test_avro_data
>8/9 Test #8: test_avro_data ...................   Passed    0.06 sec
>    Start 9: test_cpp
>9/9 Test #9: test_cpp .........................   Passed    0.01 sec
>
>89% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 9
>
>Total Test time (real) =   0.64 sec
>
>The following tests FAILED:
>  5 - test_avro_values (Failed)
>Errors while running CTest
>
>
>
>On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Scott Carey
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Checksums match.  Src tarball builds and tests pass.
>>
>> Integrated my applications with the test maven repo, they compile and
>>pass
>> tests with the new version.
>>
>> On 2/9/12 4:06 PM, "Doug Cutting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >I have created a new candidate build for Avro release 1.6.2.
>> >
>> >Changes are listed at:
>> >
>> >  http://s.apache.org/4u3
>> >
>> >Please download, test, and vote.
>> >
>> >  http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro-1.6.2-rc1/
>> >
>> >The Maven staging repository is at:
>> >
>> >  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheavro-214/
>> >
>> >Thanks in advance for voting!
>> >
>> >Doug
>>
>>

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 02/14/2012 01:35 PM, Philip Zeyliger wrote:
> > I had trouble with the C unit tests (I ran "./build.sh test" on ubuntu
> > oneiric).
>
> Is this a regression?  Do 1.6.1 tests pass on your machine?
>
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/avro/avro-1.6.1/
They do not; the same test fails.  I'm not familiar with the cmake system
here; is there a file where the test output goes?

> They do not; the same test fails.  I'm not familiar with the cmake system
> here; is there a file where the test output goes?

You can do

  $ ctest --output-on-failure

which will print out the stdout and stderr of any failed test.  Alternatively, the tests are just statically linked executables in your $BUILD_DIR/tests directory, which if you're using build.sh, ends up being $SVN_ROOT/build/c/tests.  So you can execute those commands directly:

  $ build/c/tests/test_avro_values

–doug

On 02/14/2012 02:05 PM, Philip Zeyliger wrote:
>> Is this a regression?  Do 1.6.1 tests pass on your machine?
>
> They do not; the same test fails.

Thanks for checking!

If it's not a regression then it shouldn't be a blocker.

Doug

I'm +1 on the release based on java unit tests passing.

For those interested, here's the test failure.

[0]air::tests(276231)$./test_avro_values
**** Running boolean tests ****
| 00 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. | .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. | ................
| 01 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. | .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. | ................
**** Running bytes tests ****
| 08 DE AD BE EF .. .. .. | .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. | .^->o...........
Incorrect sort order
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 02/14/2012 02:05 PM, Philip Zeyliger wrote:
> >> Is this a regression?  Do 1.6.1 tests pass on your machine?
> >
> > They do not; the same test fails.
>
> Thanks for checking!
>
> If it's not a regression then it shouldn't be a blocker.
>
> Doug
>

This passes, with 3 +1 votes from PMC members and no -1 votes.

I'll publish the release.

Thanks!

Doug

On 02/09/2012 04:06 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> I have created a new candidate build for Avro release 1.6.2.
>
> Changes are listed at:
>
>   http://s.apache.org/4u3
>
> Please download, test, and vote.
>
>   http://people.apache.org/~cutting/avro-1.6.2-rc1/
>
> The Maven staging repository is at:
>
>   https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheavro-214/
>
> Thanks in advance for voting!
>
> Doug

> For those interested, here's the test failure.
>
> [0]air::tests(276231)$./test_avro_values
> **** Running boolean tests ****
> | 00 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. | .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. | ................
> | 01 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. | .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. | ................
> **** Running bytes tests ****
> | 08 DE AD BE EF .. .. .. | .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. | .^->o...........
> Incorrect sort order

Thanks for the transcript.  I'm going to open an issue for this, but it definitely doesn't need to be a blocker for 1.6.2.  The issue is that memcmp on Oneiric returns "some negative value" for the less-than case, but that unit test expects it to specifically return -1.

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Douglas Creager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> > For those interested, here's the test failure.
> >
> > [0]air::tests(276231)$./test_avro_values
> > **** Running boolean tests ****
> > | 00 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. | .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. | ................
> > | 01 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. | .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. | ................
> > **** Running bytes tests ****
> > | 08 DE AD BE EF .. .. .. | .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. | .^->o...........
> > Incorrect sort order
>
> Thanks for the transcript.  I'm going to open an issue for this, but it
> definitely doesn't need to be a blocker for 1.6.2.  The issue is that
> memcmp on Oneiric returns "some negative value" for the less-than case, but
> that unit test expects it to specifically return -1.
Got it; thanks for looking into it.  Glad it's straight-forward.