Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
HBase, mail # user - Re: Get on a row with multiple columns


+
Varun Sharma 2013-02-09, 05:22
+
lars hofhansl 2013-02-09, 05:34
+
Varun Sharma 2013-02-09, 05:44
+
Ted Yu 2013-02-09, 05:55
+
Varun Sharma 2013-02-09, 06:05
+
lars hofhansl 2013-02-09, 06:33
+
Varun Sharma 2013-02-09, 06:45
+
Varun Sharma 2013-02-09, 06:57
+
lars hofhansl 2013-02-09, 07:31
+
lars hofhansl 2013-02-09, 07:41
+
lars hofhansl 2013-02-09, 07:57
+
Varun Sharma 2013-02-09, 08:05
+
Varun Sharma 2013-02-09, 08:11
+
lars hofhansl 2013-02-09, 08:17
+
Varun Sharma 2013-02-09, 08:29
+
Jean-Marc Spaggiari 2013-02-09, 13:02
+
lars hofhansl 2013-02-09, 16:46
+
Varun Sharma 2013-02-10, 22:35
+
Anoop Sam John 2013-02-11, 12:50
+
Varun Sharma 2013-02-11, 15:36
Copy link to this message
-
Re: Get on a row with multiple columns
Varun Sharma 2013-02-11, 16:44
I think I found a bug with the BulkDeleteEndpoint which is causing me to
lose entire rows even with COLUMN deletes. I filed a JIRA for the same and
can upload a patch.

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> No,
>
> Endpoint executes with normal QoS but it initiates a scan which seems to
> be execute on High QoS looking at the handlers. Though, I am not totally
> sure, maybe that region server was housing the .META table and those were
> actually scan.next operations for the META table. So I will need to confirm
> this.
>
> Varun
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:50 AM, Anoop Sam John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> You mean the end point is geetting executed with high QoS?  You checked
>> with some logs?
>>
>> -Anoop-
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Varun Sharma [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 4:05 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl
>> Subject: Re: Get on a row with multiple columns
>>
>> Back to BulkDeleteEndpoint, i got it to work but why are the
>> scanner.next()
>> calls executing on the Priority handler queue ?
>>
>> Varun
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 8:46 AM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > The answer is "probably" :)
>> > It's disabled in 0.96 by default. Check out HBASE-7008 (
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7008) and the discussion
>> > there.
>> >
>> > Also check out the discussion in HBASE-5943 and HADOOP-8069 (
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8069)
>> >
>> >
>> > -- Lars
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> >  From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2013 5:02 AM
>> > Subject: Re: Get on a row with multiple columns
>> >
>> > Lars, should we always consider disabling Nagle? What's the down side?
>> >
>> > JM
>> >
>> > 2013/2/9, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > > Yeah, I meant true...
>> > >
>> > > On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 12:17 AM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Should be set to true. If tcpnodelay is set to true, Nagle's is
>> > disabled.
>> > >>
>> > >> -- Lars
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> ________________________________
>> > >>  From: Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >> Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2013 12:11 AM
>> > >> Subject: Re: Get on a row with multiple columns
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Okay I did my research - these need to be set to false. I agree.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> I have ipc.client.tcpnodelay, ipc.server.tcpnodelay set to false and
>> the
>> > >> hbase one - [hbase].ipc.client.tcpnodelay set to true. Do these
>> induce
>> > >> network latency ?
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 11:57 PM, lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> >Sorry.. I meant set these two config parameters to true (not false
>> as I
>> > >> state below).
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>----- Original Message -----
>> > >> >>From: lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >> >>To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >> >>Cc:
>> > >> >>Sent: Friday, February 8, 2013 11:41 PM
>> > >> >>Subject: Re: Get on a row with multiple columns
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>Only somewhat related. Seeing the magic 40ms random read time
>> there.
>> > >> >> Did
>> > >> you disable Nagle's?
>> > >> >>(set hbase.ipc.client.tcpnodelay and ipc.server.tcpnodelay to
>> false in
>> > >> hbase-site.xml).
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>________________________________
>> > >> >>From: Varun Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >> >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; lars hofhansl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > >> >>Sent: Friday, February 8, 2013 10:45 PM
>> > >> >>Subject: Re: Get on a row with multiple columns
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>The use case is like your twitter feed. Tweets from people u
+
Varun Sharma 2013-02-11, 16:44
+
Ted Yu 2013-02-09, 06:09
+
Varun Sharma 2013-02-09, 06:16
+
Ted 2013-02-09, 06:29
+
lars hofhansl 2013-02-09, 06:34
+
Mrudula Madiraju 2013-08-14, 03:52