Jacques and I discussed this recently and we concur that it would be a
beneficial to build such an integration between the two projects.
Would you have some time to have a meeting/hangout with Drill team to talk
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 1:31 PM, James Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> The idea for the Phoenix integration was to come up with the right API to
> be able to plug Phoenix into Drill as the HBase query engine/store. Jacque
> and I got busy on our respective releases, but now that those are both out,
> I think we should get back to it. If we did it right, then both products
> would be able to continue to evolve independently, but Drill would have top
> notch query performance for HBase data and Phoenix would have a new
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Dhruv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am interested in contributing towards providing HBase Query support in
> > DRILL.
> > A) Can anyone summarize existing plan+Priority for it? (Or we can
> > in this thread and I will create WIKI page)
> > B) I see already following JIRA issues, Anybody working on this locally?
> > B-1) https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/DRILL-15<
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-15> last updated 13-Aug-13.
> > B-2) https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/DRILL-88<
> > B-3) https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/DRILL-63<
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-63>James Taylor seems
> interested to work
> > C) As per my understanding implimenting
> > package with following for local mode drill bit should suffice for POC?
> > HBASERecordReader.java
> > HBASEGroupScan
> > HBASEScanBatchCreator
> > HbaseSchemaProvider
> > HBASEStorageEngine
> > HBASEStorageEngineConfig
> > HBASESubScan
> > D) What part of https://github.com/**forcedotcom/phoenix<
> https://github.com/forcedotcom/phoenix>can we reuse? Any phonix
> contributors around?
> > -Dhruv