Thomas Graves 2012-11-20, 19:24
Tom White 2012-11-27, 12:30
Thanks Tom. I think the top level LICENSE.txt, NOTICE.txt, and README.txt
and other site docs aren't in any of the SVN tag for any 0.23/2.X
releases. I was following direction at
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToReleasePostMavenization and it says to
copy them from hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/*.txt and other files
into the tar balls after creating the tag.
Do you think we should change that procedure?
On 11/27/12 6:30 AM, "Tom White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I verified sigs and checksums, and the license and notice files - all
>looked fine to me.
>I ran RAT and noticed a number of Java files without headers. This was
>running RAT by hand, when I did 'mvn apache-rat:check' no problems
>were reported, so I think the Maven RAT checking is faulty - I've
>opened HADOOP-9097 for this.
>There's also a mismatch between the SVN tag and the contents of the
>source tarball: the tarball has top-level LICENSE.txt, NOTICE.txt,
>README.txt files (the tag doesn't), as well as some extra site
>documentation files (the latter may be a consequence of HADOOP-8860
>and when the tag was created).
>I think it's OK to release, but these last two need fixing before the
>On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Thomas Graves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> I've created a release candidate (RC0) for hadoop-0.23.5 that I would
>>like to release.
>> This release is a sustaining release with several important bug fixes
>> The RC is available at:
>> The RC tag in svn is here:
>> The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org.
>> Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 7 days.
>> Tom Graves
Tom White 2012-11-27, 17:15
Jason Lowe 2012-11-26, 17:40
Aaron T. Myers 2012-11-27, 01:48
Thomas Graves 2012-11-27, 14:41
Arun C Murthy 2012-11-26, 19:51
Chris Nauroth 2012-11-27, 00:59
Thomas Graves 2012-11-28, 12:55
Robert Evans 2012-11-26, 17:03