-Re: Reader / Writer terminology
Scott Carey 2013-06-10, 15:52
It can be a view, or a transformation. You might view data_a with
schema_b. Or, you might take binary data, conforming to schema A and
directly re-write it to binary data, conforming to schema B. Most Avro
APIs don't yet handle workflows that are not 'read' and 'write' --
transformations to or from object representations to serialized forms.
The general case includes all transformation classes as well as views.
On 6/8/13 10:16 PM, "Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Sat, 8 Jun 2013, Scott Carey wrote:
>> In a more general sense it is simply "from" and "to" -- One might move
>> from schema A to B without serialization at all, transforming a data
>> structure, or simply want a view of data in the form of A as if it was
>> in B.
>I'd like to zoom in on this specific point for a little, if I may.
>I think serialization is a red herring. It's always a transformation of
>one data structure to another, because a claim could be made that one
>cannot transform a serialized form without loading it into a data
>In fact, I think it's always the latter case, a *view*, as you aptly
>described it. Which makes it not so much a "from" and "to", but more a
>"view A as B"?
>value_b = value_a.view_as(schema_b)
>Just my late-night $0.02.