Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Plain View
Hadoop >> mail # general >> [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce committers?


+
Owen OMalley 2010-08-16, 21:38
+
Arun C Murthy 2010-08-16, 21:43
+
Jakob Homan 2010-08-16, 21:58
Copy link to this message
-
Re: [VOTE] Should we define the Common committers as HDFS + MapReduce committers?
+1 I believe that so long as we have synchronized releases then we're
co-developing a single product and should be a single community.

Doug

On 08/16/2010 02:38 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> Since the project split, it is mostly required that any MapReduce or
> HDFS committers have access to change Common. We haven't had any cases
> where we wanted to nominate any one for just Common. Toward the goal of
> simplifying the structure, I'd propose that we define the Common
> committers as precisely the union of the HDFS committers and MapReduce
> committers.
>
> Clearly, I'm +1.
>
> -- Owen
+
Nigel Daley 2010-08-16, 23:51
+
Hemanth Yamijala 2010-08-17, 06:14
+
Steve Loughran 2010-08-17, 16:07
+
Tom White 2010-08-17, 16:10
+
Chris Douglas 2010-08-17, 17:17
+
Tsz Wo \ 2010-08-17, 17:28
+
Daniel Jue 2010-08-17, 17:41
+
Konstantin Shvachko 2010-08-18, 17:59
+
Owen OMalley 2010-08-18, 18:19
+
Stack 2010-08-19, 18:40
+
Chris Douglas 2010-08-20, 21:46
+
Owen OMalley 2010-08-23, 21:40
+
Konstantin Boudnik 2010-08-17, 18:03