Home | About | Sematext search-lucene.com search-hadoop.com
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB
 Search Hadoop and all its subprojects:

Switch to Threaded View
HBase >> mail # user >> region size


Copy link to this message
-
Re: region size

re:  "with lackluster performance for random reads"

You want to be on CDH3u3 for sure if you want to boost random read
performance.
On 5/2/12 5:29 PM, "Paul Mackles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>I think the answer to this is "no", but I am hoping someone with more
>experience can confirm thisŠ we are on hbase 0.90.4 (from cdh3u2). Some
>of our storefiles have grown into the 3-4GB range (we have 100GB max
>region size). Ignoring compactions, do large storefiles like this have a
>negative impact on random reads? We only recently started doing a large
>number of random gets so I have no history to go on in terms of
>correlating storefile size with lackluster performance for random reads.
>
>Thanks,
>Paul
NEW: Monitor These Apps!
elasticsearch, apache solr, apache hbase, hadoop, redis, casssandra, amazon cloudwatch, mysql, memcached, apache kafka, apache zookeeper, apache storm, ubuntu, centOS, red hat, debian, puppet labs, java, senseiDB