re: "with lackluster performance for random reads"
You want to be on CDH3u3 for sure if you want to boost random read
On 5/2/12 5:29 PM, "Paul Mackles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I think the answer to this is "no", but I am hoping someone with more
>experience can confirm thisŠ we are on hbase 0.90.4 (from cdh3u2). Some
>of our storefiles have grown into the 3-4GB range (we have 100GB max
>region size). Ignoring compactions, do large storefiles like this have a
>negative impact on random reads? We only recently started doing a large
>number of random gets so I have no history to go on in terms of
>correlating storefile size with lackluster performance for random reads.