Hi all,

How are we doing in adopting HBase as part of required Chukwa
component?  I wonder if anyone has comment or feedback?

For releasing Chukwa 0.5, we need 2 more features implemented.
CHUKWA-567, and CHUKWA-576.  One is dealing with down sampling, and
another one is creating UDF to improve counter and gauge metrics
calculation.  Is anyone interested in taking on those tasks?

I am working on creating rpm target for hadoop and pig for ASF.  This
should improve deployment experience for the end user.

regards,
Eric

We're not ready to migrate to HBase for our Chukwa processing at this
point. This is mainly because the  current Demux approach is working
well for us and we aren't running HBase in production yet. We'd want
to run 0.5.0 using the current Demuxer and data processors.
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> How are we doing in adopting HBase as part of required Chukwa
> component?  I wonder if anyone has comment or feedback?
>
> For releasing Chukwa 0.5, we need 2 more features implemented.
> CHUKWA-567, and CHUKWA-576.  One is dealing with down sampling, and
> another one is creating UDF to improve counter and gauge metrics
> calculation.  Is anyone interested in taking on those tasks?
>
> I am working on creating rpm target for hadoop and pig for ASF.  This
> should improve deployment experience for the end user.
>
> regards,
> Eric
>

Hi Bill,

Chukwa 0.5 still supports demux by mapreduce.  However, the database
code has been removed.  Does your deployment depends on
MetricsDataLoader?

regards,
Eric

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We're not ready to migrate to HBase for our Chukwa processing at this
> point. This is mainly because the  current Demux approach is working
> well for us and we aren't running HBase in production yet. We'd want
> to run 0.5.0 using the current Demuxer and data processors.
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> How are we doing in adopting HBase as part of required Chukwa
>> component?  I wonder if anyone has comment or feedback?
>>
>> For releasing Chukwa 0.5, we need 2 more features implemented.
>> CHUKWA-567, and CHUKWA-576.  One is dealing with down sampling, and
>> another one is creating UDF to improve counter and gauge metrics
>> calculation.  Is anyone interested in taking on those tasks?
>>
>> I am working on creating rpm target for hadoop and pig for ASF.  This
>> should improve deployment experience for the end user.
>>
>> regards,
>> Eric
>>
>

No, we're not using MetricsDataLoader or any of the HICC/MySQL
functionality so we should be all good. We use Demux for 5 minute
aggregation and the hourly/daily roll-up processes with our own
summary jobs.

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> Chukwa 0.5 still supports demux by mapreduce.  However, the database
> code has been removed.  Does your deployment depends on
> MetricsDataLoader?
>
> regards,
> Eric
>
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We're not ready to migrate to HBase for our Chukwa processing at this
>> point. This is mainly because the  current Demux approach is working
>> well for us and we aren't running HBase in production yet. We'd want
>> to run 0.5.0 using the current Demuxer and data processors.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> How are we doing in adopting HBase as part of required Chukwa
>>> component?  I wonder if anyone has comment or feedback?
>>>
>>> For releasing Chukwa 0.5, we need 2 more features implemented.
>>> CHUKWA-567, and CHUKWA-576.  One is dealing with down sampling, and
>>> another one is creating UDF to improve counter and gauge metrics
>>> calculation.  Is anyone interested in taking on those tasks?
>>>
>>> I am working on creating rpm target for hadoop and pig for ASF.  This
>>> should improve deployment experience for the end user.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Eric
>>>
>>
>

Those features should continue to work as they are.  I think you are fine.

Regards,
Eric

On 2/1/11 10:55 PM, "Bill Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

No, we're not using MetricsDataLoader or any of the HICC/MySQL
functionality so we should be all good. We use Demux for 5 minute
aggregation and the hourly/daily roll-up processes with our own
summary jobs.

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> Chukwa 0.5 still supports demux by mapreduce.  However, the database
> code has been removed.  Does your deployment depends on
> MetricsDataLoader?
>
> regards,
> Eric
>
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We're not ready to migrate to HBase for our Chukwa processing at this
>> point. This is mainly because the  current Demux approach is working
>> well for us and we aren't running HBase in production yet. We'd want
>> to run 0.5.0 using the current Demuxer and data processors.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> How are we doing in adopting HBase as part of required Chukwa
>>> component?  I wonder if anyone has comment or feedback?
>>>
>>> For releasing Chukwa 0.5, we need 2 more features implemented.
>>> CHUKWA-567, and CHUKWA-576.  One is dealing with down sampling, and
>>> another one is creating UDF to improve counter and gauge metrics
>>> calculation.  Is anyone interested in taking on those tasks?
>>>
>>> I am working on creating rpm target for hadoop and pig for ASF.  This
>>> should improve deployment experience for the end user.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Eric
>>>
>>
>