No, we're not using MetricsDataLoader or any of the HICC/MySQL
functionality so we should be all good. We use Demux for 5 minute
aggregation and the hourly/daily roll-up processes with our own
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Bill,
> Chukwa 0.5 still supports demux by mapreduce. However, the database
> code has been removed. Does your deployment depends on
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Bill Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We're not ready to migrate to HBase for our Chukwa processing at this
>> point. This is mainly because the current Demux approach is working
>> well for us and we aren't running HBase in production yet. We'd want
>> to run 0.5.0 using the current Demuxer and data processors.
>> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Eric Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> How are we doing in adopting HBase as part of required Chukwa
>>> component? I wonder if anyone has comment or feedback?
>>> For releasing Chukwa 0.5, we need 2 more features implemented.
>>> CHUKWA-567, and CHUKWA-576. One is dealing with down sampling, and
>>> another one is creating UDF to improve counter and gauge metrics
>>> calculation. Is anyone interested in taking on those tasks?
>>> I am working on creating rpm target for hadoop and pig for ASF. This
>>> should improve deployment experience for the end user.